Suppr超能文献

妊娠期B族链球菌预防错误分析的结构、认知和行为模型

A Structural, Cognitive, and Behavioral Model for Error Analysis of Group B Streptococcus Prophylaxis in Pregnancy.

作者信息

Murphy Robert E, Ibekwe Jane C, Ibekwe Stella I, Refuerzo Jerrie S

机构信息

School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), Houston, Texas.

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UT Health-McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

AJP Rep. 2022 Feb 4;12(1):e17-e26. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742235. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a structural-cognitive-behavioral model for error analysis of group B streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis failure, classify delivery cases into this model, and examine compliance with treatment guidelines. A retrospective, cohort study was conducted of women with liveborn pregnancies greater than 24 weeks in April 2018 at a single hospital. We created a structural-cognitive-behavioral model of five assessments for adherence to GBS prophylaxis guidelines and then classified these into four distinct error stages. A descriptive analysis was performed to determine if the pregnancy had a perfect process, a GBS prophylaxis failure, or a fortuitous outcome. There were 313 women who met the study criteria. The rate of GBS positive was 12.8%, negative 37.4%, and unknown 49.8%. The most common errors were cognitive perception errors related to incorrectly documenting GBS status, 57.7% (  = 79). Of these errors, 15.2% (  = 12) led to GBS prophylaxis failure. Perfect outcomes occurred in 62.7% (  = 196) women, GBS prophylaxis failure occurred in 13.7% (  = 43), and fortuitous outcomes occurred in 23.6% (  = 74). In our study, we were able to identify structural, cognitive, and behavioral errors that contribute to GBS prophylaxis failures. In other cases, these errors may contribute to fortuitous outcomes.

摘要

本研究的目的是建立一个用于分析B族链球菌(GBS)预防失败的结构-认知-行为模型,将分娩病例归入该模型,并检查对治疗指南的依从性。对2018年4月在一家医院分娩孕周大于24周的活产孕妇进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们创建了一个用于评估GBS预防指南依从性的包含五项评估的结构-认知-行为模型,然后将这些评估分为四个不同的错误阶段。进行描述性分析以确定妊娠过程是完美、GBS预防失败还是偶然结果。共有313名女性符合研究标准。GBS阳性率为12.8%,阴性率为37.4%,未知率为49.8%。最常见的错误是与GBS状态记录错误相关的认知感知错误,占57.7%(n = 79)。在这些错误中,15.2%(n = 12)导致GBS预防失败。62.7%(n = 196)的女性妊娠结局完美,13.7%(n = 43)发生GBS预防失败,23.6%(n = 74)出现偶然结果。在我们的研究中,我们能够识别出导致GBS预防失败的结构、认知和行为错误。在其他情况下,这些错误可能导致偶然结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0c0/8816629/d06690a1bab2/10-1055-s-0041-1742235-i210002-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验