Pradhan Namrata, Fan Xuli, Martini Francesco, Chen Huayang, Liu Hong, Gao Jiangyun, Goodale Uromi Manage
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Daxuedonglu 100, Nanning, Guangxi, 530004, People's Republic of China.
State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Daxuedonglu 100, Nanning, Guangxi, 530004, People's Republic of China.
Bot Stud. 2022 Feb 10;63(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40529-022-00333-0.
Seed viability testing is essential in plant conservation and research. Seed viability testing determines the success of ex-situ conservation efforts, such as seed banking but commonly testing protocols of orchids lack consistency and accuracy, therefore, there is a need to select an appropriate and reliable viability test, especially when conducting comparative studies. Here, we evaluated the suitability of three seed viability tests, Evans blue test (EB), Fluorescein diacetate test (FDA) and Tetrazolium test (TTC), with and without sterilization, on seeds of 20 orchid species, which included five epiphytes and fifteen terrestrials, using both fresh seeds and seeds stored at - 18 ºC for 6 to 8 years.
We found that sterilization and lifeform of seeds affected seed viability across all tests but the storage time was not an influential factor. Sterilization negatively affected seed viability under EB and FDA test conditions but increased the detection of viable seeds in the TTC test in both epiphytic and terrestrial species. The EB test, when administered without sterilization provided the highest viability results. Being non-enzymatic unlike TTC and FDA tests, as expected, the EB test was the most reliable with similar results between sterilized and not sterilized seeds for most epiphytic and terrestrial species as well as when compared between groups.
The lifeform of the species and seed sterilization prior to testing are important influential factors in orchid seed viability testing. Since EB test was found to be reliable we recommend the EB test for seed viability assessment in orchids rather than the less reliable but commonly used TTC test, or the FDA test, which require more expensive and sophisticated instrumentation. Since storage time was not an influential factor in orchid seed viability testing, the recommendations of this study can be used for both fresh as well as long-term stored orchid seeds. This is helpful for research and especially for conservation measures such as seed banking. However, due to the species specificity of the bio-physiology of orchids, we call for comprehensive viability test assessment in the hyper diverse orchid family to be extended to a greater number of species to facilitate efficient conservation and research.
种子活力测试在植物保护和研究中至关重要。种子活力测试决定了迁地保护措施(如种子库)的成功与否,但兰花常用的测试方案缺乏一致性和准确性,因此,需要选择一种合适且可靠的活力测试方法,尤其是在进行比较研究时。在此,我们评估了三种种子活力测试方法,即伊文思蓝测试(EB)、荧光素二乙酸酯测试(FDA)和四唑盐测试(TTC),在有无灭菌处理的情况下,对20种兰花种子的适用性,这些兰花包括5种附生兰和15种地生兰,使用的种子既有新鲜种子,也有在-18℃下储存6至8年的种子。
我们发现,灭菌处理和种子的生活型在所有测试中都会影响种子活力,但储存时间不是一个影响因素。在EB和FDA测试条件下,灭菌处理对种子活力有负面影响,但在附生兰和地生兰物种中,灭菌处理都增加了TTC测试中活力种子的检出率。未经灭菌处理时,EB测试得出的活力结果最高。与TTC和FDA测试不同,EB测试是非酶促的,正如预期的那样,对于大多数附生兰和地生兰物种以及不同组之间的比较,EB测试在灭菌种子和未灭菌种子之间得出的结果相似,是最可靠的。
物种的生活型和测试前的种子灭菌处理是兰花种子活力测试中的重要影响因素。由于发现EB测试可靠,我们建议在兰花种子活力评估中使用EB测试,而不是可靠性较低但常用的TTC测试或需要更昂贵和复杂仪器的FDA测试。由于储存时间不是兰花种子活力测试中的影响因素,本研究的建议可用于新鲜种子以及长期储存的兰花种子。这对研究尤其是对种子库等保护措施很有帮助。然而,由于兰花生物生理学的物种特异性,我们呼吁对极度多样化的兰科植物进行全面的活力测试评估,以扩展到更多物种,从而促进有效的保护和研究。