Diabetes Research Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong, China-UK Collaboration, China.
Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Jun;37(3):561-569. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07319-x. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
To compare the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4Is) on adverse outcomes in diabetic patients in Hong Kong.
This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (n = 72,746) treated with SGLT2I or DPP4I between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, in Hong Kong. Patients with exposure to both DPP4I and SGLT2I therapy, without complete demographics or mortality data, or who had prior atrial fibrillation (AF) were excluded. The study outcomes were new-onset AF, stroke/transient ischemic attack, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) between SGLT2I and DPP4I users was performed.
The unmatched study cohort included 21,713 SGLT2I users and 39,510 DPP4I users (total: n = 61,233 patients; 55.37% males, median age: 62.7 years [interquartile range (IQR): 54.6-71.9 years]). Over a median follow-up of 2030 (IQR: 1912-2117) days, 2496 patients (incidence rate [IR]: 4.07%) developed new-onset AF, 2179 patients (IR: 3.55%) developed stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1963 (IR: 3.20%) died from cardiovascular causes and 6607 patients (IR: 10.79%) suffered from all-cause mortality. After propensity score matching (SGLT2I: n = 21,713; DPP4I: n = 21,713), SGLT2I users showed lower incidence of new-onset AF (1.96% vs. 2.78%, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.05), stroke (1.80% vs. 3.52%, SMD = 0.11), cardiovascular mortality (0.47% vs. 1.56%, SMD = 0.11) and all-cause mortality (2.59% vs. 7.47%, SMD = 0.22) compared to DPP4I users. Cox regression found that SGLT2I users showed lower risk of new-onset AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.56, 0.83], P = 0.0001), stroke (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: [0.53, 0.79], P < 0.0001), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: [0.27, 0.56], P < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: [0.37, 0.51], P < 0.0001) after adjusting for significant demographics, past comorbidities, medications and laboratory tests.
Based on real-world data of type 2 diabetic patients in Hong Kong, SGLT2I use was associated with lower risk of incident AF, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality outcomes compared to DPP4I use.
比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2Is)和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP4Is)对香港糖尿病患者不良结局的影响。
这是一项回顾性基于人群的 2 型糖尿病患者队列研究(n=72746),这些患者在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在香港接受 SGLT2I 或 DPP4I 治疗。排除同时接受 DPP4I 和 SGLT2I 治疗、无完整人口统计学或死亡率数据或既往有房颤(AF)的患者。研究结果为新发 AF、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作、心血管死亡率和全因死亡率。对 SGLT2I 和 DPP4I 使用者进行倾向评分匹配(1:1 比例)。
未匹配的研究队列包括 21713 例 SGLT2I 使用者和 39510 例 DPP4I 使用者(总计:n=61233 例患者;55.37%为男性,中位年龄:62.7 岁[四分位距(IQR):54.6-71.9 岁])。在中位数为 2030 天(IQR:1912-2117)的随访期间,2496 例患者(发病率[IR]:4.07%)新发 AF,2179 例患者(IR:3.55%)发生卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作,1963 例患者(IR:3.20%)死于心血管原因,6607 例患者(IR:10.79%)发生全因死亡。在进行倾向评分匹配(SGLT2I:n=21713;DPP4I:n=21713)后,SGLT2I 使用者新发 AF(1.96% vs. 2.78%,标准化均数差值[SMD]=0.05)、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(1.80% vs. 3.52%,SMD=0.11)、心血管死亡率(0.47% vs. 1.56%,SMD=0.11)和全因死亡率(2.59% vs. 7.47%,SMD=0.22)的发生率均低于 DPP4I 使用者。Cox 回归发现,SGLT2I 使用者新发 AF(风险比[HR]:0.68,95%置信区间[CI]:[0.56, 0.83],P=0.0001)、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(HR:0.64,95%CI:[0.53, 0.79],P<0.0001)、心血管死亡率(HR:0.39,95%CI:[0.27, 0.56],P<0.0001)和全因死亡率(HR:0.44,95%CI:[0.37, 0.51],P<0.0001)的风险均低于 DPP4I 使用者,且在调整重要的人口统计学、既往合并症、药物和实验室检查后,差异仍有统计学意义。
基于香港 2 型糖尿病患者的真实世界数据,与 DPP4I 相比,SGLT2I 可降低新发 AF、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作以及心血管和全因死亡率的风险。