Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin.
School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Hypertens. 2021 Aug 1;39(8):1717-1724. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002866.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be associated with higher susceptibility of COVID-19 infection and adverse outcomes. We compared ACEI/ARB use and COVID-19 positivity in a case-control design, and severity in COVID-19 positive patients.
Consecutive patients who attended Hong Kong's public hospitals or outpatient clinics between 1 January and 28 July 2020 for COVID-19 real time-PCR (RT-PCR) tests were included. Baseline demographics, past comorbidities, laboratory tests and use of different medications were compared between COVID-19 positive and negative patients. Severe endpoints for COVID-19 positive patients were 28-day mortality, need for intensive care admission or intubation.
This study included 213 788 patients (COVID-19 positive: n = 2774 patients; negative: n = 211 014). In total, 162 COVID-19 positive patients (5.83%) met the severity outcome. The use of ACEI/ARB was significantly higher amongst cases than controls (n = 156/2774, 5.62 vs. n = 6708/211014, 3.17%; P < 0.0001). Significant univariate predictors of COVID-19 positivity and severe COVID-19 disease were older age, higher Charlson score, comorbidities, use of ACEI/ARB, antidiabetic, lipid-lowering, anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs and laboratory tests (odds ratio >1, P < 0.05). The relationship between the use of ACEI/ARB and COVID-19 positivity or severe disease remained significant after multivariable adjustment. No significant differences in COVID-19 positivity or disease severity between ACEI and ARB use were observed (P > 0.05).
There was a significant relationship between ACEI/ARB use and COVID-19 positivity and severe disease after adjusting for significant confounders.
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)可能与 COVID-19 感染和不良结局的更高易感性有关。我们以病例对照的方式比较了 ACEI/ARB 的使用与 COVID-19 阳性的关系,并比较了 COVID-19 阳性患者的严重程度。
连续纳入 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 7 月 28 日期间在香港公立医院或门诊诊所因 COVID-19 实时 PCR(RT-PCR)检测就诊的患者。比较 COVID-19 阳性和阴性患者的基线人口统计学、既往合并症、实验室检查和不同药物的使用情况。COVID-19 阳性患者的严重终点为 28 天死亡率、需要重症监护入院或插管。
这项研究共纳入 213788 例患者(COVID-19 阳性:n=2774 例;阴性:n=211014 例)。共有 162 例 COVID-19 阳性患者(5.83%)符合严重结局标准。病例组 ACEI/ARB 的使用率明显高于对照组(n=156/2774,5.62%;n=6708/211014,3.17%;P<0.0001)。COVID-19 阳性和严重 COVID-19 疾病的单变量显著预测因素为年龄较大、Charlson 评分较高、合并症、ACEI/ARB 使用、降糖药、降脂药、抗凝药和抗血小板药物以及实验室检查(比值比>1,P<0.05)。在多变量调整后,ACEI/ARB 使用与 COVID-19 阳性或严重疾病之间仍存在显著关系。ACEI 和 ARB 使用率与 COVID-19 阳性或疾病严重程度之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。
在调整了显著混杂因素后,ACEI/ARB 的使用与 COVID-19 阳性和严重疾病之间存在显著关系。