Suppr超能文献

在左束支起搏和左心室间隔起搏中,起搏部位哪一个更靠近左心室间隔心内膜?

Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?

作者信息

Peng Xin-Yi, Wang Yan-Jiang, Sun Lan-Lan, Shi Liang, Cheng Chao-Di, Huang Li-Hong, Tian Ying, Liu Xing-Peng

机构信息

Heart Center, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.

Department of Echocardiography, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;66(3):539-549. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01143-x. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Distinguishing between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) is challenging. This study aimed to compare the echocardiographic distance from the pacing lead tip to the left ventricular (LV) septal endocardium between patients who underwent LBBP and those who underwent LVSP successfully.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients (age 71.9 ± 12.0 years, 35.6% male) with traditional indications for permanent cardiac pacing were included (LBBP group, n = 46; LVSP group, n = 13). Unipolar pacing from the final pacing sites generated narrow QRS complexes with a right bundle branch block pattern in all patients. After the procedure, a physician blinded to the group allocation performed echocardiographic measurements of the distance between the lead tip and the LV septal endocardium.

RESULTS

The mean paced QRS duration was comparable between the LBBP group and the LVSP group (105.3 ± 15.6 ms vs. 109.2 ± 9.6 ms, P = 0.287). In the LBBP group, the interval from the left bundle branch potential to QRS onset was 28.7 ± 9.0 ms. During diastole, the mean distance between the lead tip and the LV septal endocardium was 0.6 ± 0.9 mm in the LBBP group and 3.0 ± 1.6 mm in the LVSP group (P < 0.001). During systole, the distance was 1.5 ± 1.4 mm in the LBBP group and 4.3 ± 2.6 mm in the LVSP group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The landing zone of the lead tip was closer to the LV septal endocardium in the patients who underwent LBBP. There is a need for real-time intraprocedural monitoring of the distance between the lead tip and the LV septal endocardium when performing LBBP.

摘要

目的

区分左束支起搏(LBBP)和左心室间隔起搏(LVSP)具有挑战性。本研究旨在比较接受LBBP的患者与成功接受LVSP的患者起搏导线尖端至左心室(LV)间隔心内膜的超声心动图距离。

方法

纳入59例有永久性心脏起搏传统适应证的连续患者(年龄71.9±12.0岁,男性占35.6%)(LBBP组,n = 46;LVSP组,n = 13)。所有患者从最终起搏部位进行单极起搏均产生呈右束支传导阻滞图形的窄QRS波群。术后,由对分组情况不知情的医生进行超声心动图测量导线尖端与LV间隔心内膜之间的距离。

结果

LBBP组和LVSP组的平均起搏QRS时限相当(105.3±15.6毫秒对109.2±9.6毫秒,P = 0.287)。在LBBP组,从左束支电位至QRS波起始的间期为28.7±9.0毫秒。在舒张期,LBBP组导线尖端与LV间隔心内膜之间的平均距离为0.6±0.9毫米,LVSP组为3.0±1.6毫米(P < 0.001)。在收缩期,LBBP组该距离为1.5±1.4毫米,LVSP组为4.3±2.6毫米(P < 0.001)。

结论

接受LBBP的患者中导线尖端的着陆区更靠近LV间隔心内膜。在进行LBBP时需要对导线尖端与LV间隔心内膜之间的距离进行实时术中监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验