Section of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research, Leeds Institute of Medical Research (LIMR) at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Mar;31(2):e13557. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13557. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
This study aimed to explore experiences of follow-up after treatment and views on an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) pathway among ovarian cancer patients and clinicians.
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians and patients previously treated for ovarian cancer. Interviews explored experiences of the current follow-up pathway, patients' needs and views on an ePRO pathway enabling patients to report symptoms online rather than attend clinic-based appointments. Transcripts were analysed using framework analysis.
Sixteen patients and 10 clinicians participated from four hospitals in England. Four key themes were identified: transition into follow-up, key features of effective follow-up, issues in follow-up and views of ePRO. Both patients and clinicians saw benefits of an ePRO pathway alongside continued access to specialist support and discussed various practicalities (e.g., frequency, introduction and communication). Technology concerns and feelings of abandonment were highlighted as barriers. The proposed impact on clinical and individual patient outcomes was discussed.
Patient and clinician views on follow-up and an ePRO pathway informed key recommendations on the development/introduction of ePRO follow-up. Technology use in healthcare will continue to grow and may offer solutions to facilitate responsive and tailored care. Further research should explore the safety, experiences and acceptability of ePRO follow-up.
本研究旨在探讨卵巢癌患者和临床医生在治疗后随访体验以及对电子患者报告结局(ePRO)途径的看法。
对先前接受过卵巢癌治疗的临床医生和患者进行了半结构化定性访谈。访谈内容包括当前随访途径的体验、患者的需求以及对能够使患者在线报告症状而不是进行基于诊所的预约的 ePRO 途径的看法。使用框架分析法对转录本进行了分析。
来自英格兰的四家医院共有 16 名患者和 10 名临床医生参与。确定了四个关键主题:随访的过渡、有效随访的关键特征、随访中的问题和对 ePRO 的看法。患者和临床医生都认为 ePRO 途径结合持续获得专业支持具有益处,并讨论了各种实际问题(例如,频率、引入和沟通)。技术问题和被抛弃的感觉被认为是障碍。还讨论了对临床和个体患者结局的预期影响。
患者和临床医生对随访和 ePRO 途径的看法为 ePRO 随访的开发/引入提供了重要建议。医疗保健领域的技术使用将继续增长,并可能提供解决方案,以促进响应性和个性化的护理。应进一步研究 ePRO 随访的安全性、体验和可接受性。