Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Department of Radiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 11;101(6):e28801. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028801.
The initiation of therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASVCD) is currently guided by cohort-based risk scores. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) offers more personalised risk assessments to optimise therapy allocation. This study investigates the utility of CCTA determined coronary stenosis (both obstructive and non-obstructive plaque) to guide allocation of lipid lowering therapy. A retrospective analysis of 450 patients with CCTA performed for the assessment of chest pain at a single centre was conducted. Baseline characteristics, investigations, treatments and clinical outcomes were recorded. The allocation of lipid lowering therapy was evaluated with three models, cohort-based risk score (pooled cohort equation), a previously validated CCTA based clinical risk score (pooled cohort equation and CCTA findings) and CCTA alone (without clinical characteristics). The reclassification analysis included 266 patients. Compared to the cohort-based risk score, CCTA based clinical risk score in total reassigned 23% of patients. CCTA alone compared to the CCTA based clinical risk score correctly reassigned 23% and incorrectly reassigned 10%. When comparing the performance of CCTA alone against the cohort-based risk score, both the additive NRI of 25.8 (95% CI 4.12-37.56) and absolute NRI of 13.2 (95% CI 5.88-19.77) was significant. Revascularisation was required in 3% with a low cohort-based risk, but no patients with low risk as per CCTA alone or CCTA based clinical risk score required revascularisation The use of a CCTA based clinical risk score or CCTA alone compared to cohort-based risk scores can improve the allocation of lipid lowering therapy.
目前,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASVCD)的治疗起始取决于基于队列的风险评分。冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)提供了更个性化的风险评估,以优化治疗分配。本研究调查了 CCTA 确定的冠状动脉狭窄(包括阻塞性和非阻塞性斑块)指导降脂治疗分配的效用。对单一中心进行 CCTA 评估胸痛的 450 例患者进行了回顾性分析。记录了基线特征、检查、治疗和临床结果。使用三种模型评估降脂治疗的分配,即基于队列的风险评分(汇总队列方程)、以前验证过的基于 CCTA 的临床风险评分(汇总队列方程和 CCTA 结果)以及单独的 CCTA(不包括临床特征)。重新分类分析包括 266 例患者。与基于队列的风险评分相比,基于 CCTA 的临床风险评分总共重新分配了 23%的患者。单独的 CCTA 与基于 CCTA 的临床风险评分相比,正确地重新分配了 23%,错误地重新分配了 10%。当将单独的 CCTA 与基于队列的风险评分进行比较时,两者的附加 NRI 为 25.8(95%CI 4.12-37.56),绝对 NRI 为 13.2(95%CI 5.88-19.77)均有统计学意义。低风险评分的患者中有 3%需要血运重建,但根据单独的 CCTA 或基于 CCTA 的临床风险评分,低风险的患者均无需血运重建。与基于队列的风险评分相比,使用基于 CCTA 的临床风险评分或单独的 CCTA 可以改善降脂治疗的分配。