• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Serum osmolarity does not predict mortality in patients with respiratory failure.血清渗透压不能预测呼吸衰竭患者的死亡率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 11;101(6):e28840. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028840.
2
Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及简化急性生理学评分系统II在重症监护病房百草枯中毒患者中的预后评分系统的有效性。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 May;36(5):431-437. doi: 10.1177/0960327116657602. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
3
Combination of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) could predict the severity and prognosis of candidemia more accurately than the Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)的联合应用,较急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II(APACHE II)评分能更准确地预测念珠菌血症的严重程度和预后。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 15;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05719-8.
4
Severe acute pancreatitis admitted to intensive care unit: SOFA is superior to Ranson's criteria and APACHE II in determining prognosis.入住重症监护病房的重症急性胰腺炎:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)在判断预后方面优于兰森标准和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2013;24(5):430-5. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2013.0761.
5
[Prognostic value of Charlson weighted index of comorbidities combined with sequential organ failure assessment score and procalcitonin in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者中Charlson合并症加权指数联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分及降钙素原的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Nov;31(11):1335-1339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.11.005.
6
Comparative evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring systems in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.心脏重症监护病房住院患者急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II和序贯器官衰竭评估评分系统的比较评价
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Serum osmolality and outcome in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者的血清渗透压与预后
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):970-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01096.x.
8
[Predictive value of four different scoring systems for septic patient's outcome: a retrospective analysis with 311 patients].[四种不同评分系统对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:311例患者的回顾性分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):133-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.008.
9
[Prognostic value of coagulation function combined with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scores for patients with bloodstream infection].凝血功能联合急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及序贯器官衰竭评估评分对血流感染患者的预后价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Dec;33(12):1434-1439. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210910-01361.
10
[Establishment of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome early warning score in patients with severe trauma and its clinical significance: a multicenter study].[严重创伤患者多器官功能障碍综合征预警评分的建立及其临床意义:一项多中心研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jan;30(1):41-46. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.01.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on Prognosis and Blood Gas Level in COPD Patients Complicated with Respiratory Failure.无创正压通气对慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并呼吸衰竭患者预后及血气水平的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 5;2022:3089227. doi: 10.1155/2022/3089227. eCollection 2022.

血清渗透压不能预测呼吸衰竭患者的死亡率。

Serum osmolarity does not predict mortality in patients with respiratory failure.

机构信息

Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pulmonology, Alanya, Antalya, Turkey.

University of Health Sciences Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 11;101(6):e28840. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028840.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000028840
PMID:35147129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830864/
Abstract

We aimed to determine the parameters that affect mortality in pulmonary intensive care units that are faster and inexpensive to determine than existing scoring systems. The relationship between serum osmolarity and prognosis was demonstrated for predialysis patients, in acute pulmonary embolism, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the literature. We hypothesized that serum osmolarity, which is routinely evaluated, may have prognostic significance in patients with respiratory failure.This study comprised 449 patients treated in the Pulmonary Intensive Care Clinic (PICU) of our hospital between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. The modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Assessment (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Evaluation Score (SOFA), Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), and hospitalization serum osmolarity levels were measured.Of the 449 patients included in the study, 65% (n = 292) were female and the mean age of all patients was 69.86 ± 1.72 years. About 83.1% (n = 373) of the patients included in the study were discharged with good recovery. About 4.9% (n = 22) were transferred to the ward because their intensive care needs were over. About 6.9% (n = 31) were transferred to the tertiary intensive care unit after their status deteriorated. About 5.1% (n = 23) died in the PICU. In the mortality group, APACHE II (P = .005), mCCI (P < .001), NRS-2002 total score (P < .001), and SOFA score (P < .001) were significantly higher. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of serum osmolarity levels.Although we could not determine serum osmolarity as a practical method to predict patient prognosis in this study, we assume that our results will guide future studies on this subject.

摘要

我们旨在确定比现有评分系统更快、更经济实惠的影响肺重症监护病房死亡率的参数。文献中已经证明了血清渗透压与透析前患者的急性肺栓塞、心力衰竭、急性冠状动脉综合征、心肌梗死和急性自发性脑出血之间的关系。我们假设,在呼吸衰竭患者中,常规评估的血清渗透压可能具有预后意义。

这项研究包括了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间在我们医院的肺重症监护病房(PICU)接受治疗的 449 名患者。测量了改良 Charlson 合并症指数(mCCI)、急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估评分(SOFA)、营养风险筛查 2002(NRS-2002)和住院期间的血清渗透压水平。

在纳入研究的 449 名患者中,65%(n=292)为女性,所有患者的平均年龄为 69.86±1.72 岁。研究中纳入的患者中有 83.1%(n=373)出院时恢复良好。约 4.9%(n=22)因需要的重症监护治疗结束而转入病房。约 6.9%(n=31)因病情恶化转入三级重症监护病房。约 5.1%(n=23)在 PICU 死亡。在死亡组中,APACHE II(P=0.005)、mCCI(P<0.001)、NRS-2002 总分(P<0.001)和 SOFA 评分(P<0.001)显著更高。两组之间的血清渗透压水平没有统计学上的显著差异。

尽管我们不能确定血清渗透压作为预测患者预后的实用方法,但我们假设我们的结果将指导这一主题的未来研究。