Aoki Shimpo, Nagano Hisato, Kiyosawa Tomoharu, Tsuda Yoshifumi, Izumiyama Ko
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Minamitama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):186-192. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2022.2032105. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
Acute hand edema often results in loss of fine hand motor activities, especially without appropriate care. There is still no reliable and easy to use method to measure hand edema. In this study, we tested a handheld three-dimensional (3D) scanner on plastic male and female hand models using a whole hand measuring method (WM) and a modified method (MM) which excluded fingers. We evaluated the intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability and compared the measured volumes to computed tomography (CT) findings. Statistical analysis showed that the 3D scan method was valid and reliable for both WM and MM methods. In WM, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.97 and 0.84, with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.87-1.00 and 0.61-0.94, respectively. In MM, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.96 and 0.83, with 95% CI of 0.84-1.00 and 0.61-0.94, respectively. In comparison to the CT, the differences between 3D scan and CT in the male model volumes were 30.35 ± 2.70 cm (mean ± standard deviation) for WM and 11.60 ± 2.07 cm for MM. In the female model, the differences were 18.92 ± 2.66 cm and 11.18 ± 2.35 cm, respectively. In both models, MM was significantly more accurate than WM ( < 0.001). When used in a clinical case, the scanner recorded changes in actual volume through the course of treatment. This cost-effective handheld 3D camera can be a reliable tool for evaluating hand edema even in cases of acute injury.
急性手部水肿常常导致手部精细运动功能丧失,尤其是在缺乏恰当护理的情况下。目前仍然没有可靠且易于使用的方法来测量手部水肿。在本研究中,我们使用全手测量法(WM)和排除手指的改良法(MM),在男性和女性塑料手部模型上测试了一款手持式三维(3D)扫描仪。我们评估了评分者内信度和评分者间信度,并将测量体积与计算机断层扫描(CT)结果进行比较。统计分析表明,3D扫描法对于WM和MM方法都是有效且可靠的。在WM中,评分者内信度和评分者间信度分别为0.97和0.84,95%置信区间(CI)分别为0.87 - 1.00和0.61 - 0.94。在MM中,评分者内信度和评分者间信度分别为0.96和0.83,95%CI分别为0.84 - 1.00和0.61 - 0.94。与CT相比,男性模型中3D扫描与CT在体积上的差异,WM为30.35±2.70 cm(均值±标准差),MM为11.60±2.07 cm。在女性模型中,差异分别为18.92±2.66 cm和11.18±2.35 cm。在两个模型中,MM均显著比WM更准确(<0.001)。在临床病例中使用时,该扫描仪记录了治疗过程中实际体积的变化。这款经济高效的手持式3D相机即使在急性损伤病例中也可成为评估手部水肿的可靠工具。