Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy (NACT + CCRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy following CCRT (CCRT + ACT) have inconsistent effects on the survival of women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) compared to CCRT. Moreover, the effects of NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT have not been clearly compared. This study compared the effects of NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT on survival using a network meta-analysis to select the optimal treatment in women with LACC.

METHODS

The PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched, and six randomized controlled trials assessing the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with newly diagnosed LACC treated with NACT + CCRT, CCRT + ACT, or CCRT alone (controls) were identified. A network meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Indirect comparisons showed no significant differences in PFS and OS between NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT. Direct comparisons also showed similar PFS and OS between NACT + CCRT and CCRT and between CCRT + ACT and CCRT. CCRT + ACT exhibited the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value as a better treatment option for the PFS and OS (CCRT + ACT vs. NACT + CCRT vs. CCRT: 72% vs. 26.8% vs. 51.2% in PFS and 64.3% vs. 45.1% vs. 40.7% in OS).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with LACC, NACT + CCRT had no different effects on the PFS and OS compared to CCRT + ACT, despite the relatively higher SUCRA value observed for CCRT + ACT. Further studies are warranted to clarify the effects of these strategies.