School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Oct;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):128-133. doi: 10.1002/hpja.581. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
Programs by, with and for Aboriginal older people must be culturally safe and relevant. Successful elements include being Aboriginal specific and group based. Co-design with Aboriginal people and stakeholders is essential. We describe the co-design process of developing the Ironbark: Healthy Community program.
Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing and yarning conversational methods guided the development process, during 2018. A desktop review provided details of current group characteristics and key community stakeholders. Stakeholder engagement regarding views about group operations, participants and benefits also occurred. Aboriginal Elders views of their groups were gathered through yarning circles in New South Wales (NSW). Grounded theory approach was used to ascertain key themes.
Initial engagement occurred with 13 different community stakeholders and organisations in three Australian states (NSW, South Australia (SA), Western Australia (WA)). Three yarning circles occurred with Elders from urban (N = 10), regional coastal (N = 10) and regional country (N = 4) groups. Six key themes were organised in three groups according to an Aboriginal ontology. 1. Knowing: groups provide opportunities to share knowledge and connect socially. Adequate program resourcing and sustainability are valued. 2. Being: groups strengthen culture, providing important social, emotional and other forms of support to age well. 3. Doing: previous program experiences inform perceptions for new program operations. Group venues and operational aspects should be culturally safe, acknowledging diversity among Elders, their preferences and community control. Themes were used to develop the program and its resource manual that were finalised with stakeholders, including steering committee approval.
Stakeholder feedback at multiple stages and Aboriginal Elders' perspectives resulted in a new co-designed community program involving weekly yarning circles and social activities. So what?: Co-design, guided by Aboriginal ways of knowing, being and doing, can develop programs relevant for Aboriginal people.
针对原住民老年人的项目必须在文化上安全且具有相关性。成功的要素包括针对特定的原住民群体,并以群体为基础。与原住民和利益相关者共同设计是至关重要的。我们描述了开发“Ironbark:健康社区”项目的共同设计过程。
在 2018 年期间,原住民的认知、存在和行动方式以及对话式的“yarning”方法指导了整个发展过程。桌面审查提供了当前群体特征和主要社区利益相关者的详细信息。还就团体运作、参与者和收益的看法与利益相关者进行了协商。通过在新南威尔士州(新州)的“yarning”圈子收集了原住民长者对其群体的看法。采用扎根理论方法确定了关键主题。
最初在澳大利亚三个州(新州、南澳大利亚州(南澳)和西澳大利亚州(西澳))的 13 个不同社区利益相关者和组织进行了接触。在城市(N=10)、沿海地区(N=10)和农村地区(N=4)的三个原住民长者“yarning”圈子中进行了三次讨论。根据原住民本体论,六个关键主题被分为三组。1. 认知:群体提供了分享知识和社交的机会。充足的项目资源和可持续性受到重视。2. 存在:群体强化了文化,为老年人的幸福提供了重要的社会、情感和其他形式的支持。3. 行动:先前的项目经验影响对新的项目运营的看法。群体场所和运营方面应该具有文化安全性,承认长者之间的多样性、他们的偏好和社区控制。这些主题被用于开发该项目及其资源手册,最终与利益相关者一起完成,包括指导委员会的批准。
在多个阶段的利益相关者反馈和原住民长者的观点的基础上,开发了一个新的共同设计的社区项目,包括每周的“yarning”圈子和社交活动。那么关键是什么呢?在原住民的认知、存在和行动方式的指导下进行共同设计,可以开发出针对原住民的相关项目。