Suppr超能文献

四种桩黏固技术的比较。

Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts.

作者信息

Goldstein G R, Hudis S I, Weintraub D E

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Feb;55(2):209-11. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90345-8.

Abstract

Four techniques for the cementation of cast post restorations were compared in extracted single-rooted teeth. The techniques used were the lentula spiral, endodontic explorer, paper point, and direct post application. Evaluation was based on the presence of voids in the cement and retention of the post. The lentula spiral technique was performed without voids. The other techniques produced voids in increasing numbers in the following order: the endodontic explorer, direct application, and the paper point. The voids were commonly located along the shaft of the post, but there was no correlation between the number of voids and the retention of the posts.

摘要

在拔除的单根牙中比较了四种铸造桩修复体黏固技术。所使用的技术为螺旋输送器、根管探针、纸尖和直接桩应用。评估基于黏固剂中孔隙的存在情况以及桩的固位情况。螺旋输送器技术操作时无孔隙。其他技术产生的孔隙数量依次增加:根管探针、直接应用和纸尖。孔隙通常沿桩的杆部分布,但孔隙数量与桩的固位之间无相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验