• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仰卧位与俯卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗老年患者的比较。

Supine <em>versus</em> Prone Miniaturised Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Elderly Patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Bozyaka Teaching and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Haseki Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022 Mar;32(3):340-345. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.03.340.

DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2022.03.340
PMID:35148587
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of mini-PCNL (miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy) in prone and supine positions in elderly patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Turkey, between April 2017 and January 2021.

METHODOLOGY

Patients over 65 years of age were included in the study. All patients' comorbidities were recorded and charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was calculated. The groups were compared in terms of perioperative values, stone-free rates and complication rates. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for complication development. Postoperative complications were noted according to the Clavien scoring system (CSS).

RESULTS

There were 54 patients in the supine mini-PCNL group and 64 in the prone mini-PCNL group. The median ages were 67 in the prone and 66 in the supine group. CCI scores were similar in both groups (p = 0.735). Stone-free and total complication rates were not statistically different in the groups (p = 0.994 and p = 0.247, respectively). However, grade 1-2 complication rates were significantly higher in the prone group (p=0.020). CCI score and stone size were significantly associated with the development of complications (p = 0.018 and p = 0.034, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first to compare the outcomes of mini-PCNL in prone and supine position in geriatric patients. Supine mini-PCNL is a potentially safer alternative treatment method for older patients with high CCI scores. Key Words: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Supine position, Elderly, Mini-PCNl, CCI score.

摘要

目的

比较老年患者俯卧位和仰卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术(mini-PCNL)的疗效。

研究设计

队列研究。

地点和研究时间

土耳其健康科学大学泌尿科,2017 年 4 月至 2021 年 1 月。

方法

纳入年龄在 65 岁以上的患者。记录所有患者的合并症,并计算 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)评分。比较两组患者围手术期指标、结石清除率和并发症发生率。采用逻辑回归分析评估并发症发生的危险因素。根据 Clavien 评分系统(CSS)记录术后并发症。

结果

仰卧位 mini-PCNL 组 54 例,俯卧位 mini-PCNL 组 64 例。俯卧位组和仰卧位组的中位年龄分别为 67 岁和 66 岁。两组 CCI 评分相似(p = 0.735)。两组结石清除率和总并发症发生率无统计学差异(p = 0.994 和 p = 0.247)。然而,俯卧位组 1-2 级并发症发生率明显较高(p = 0.020)。CCI 评分和结石大小与并发症的发生显著相关(p = 0.018 和 p = 0.034)。

结论

本研究首次比较了老年患者俯卧位和仰卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术的疗效。对于 CCI 评分较高的老年患者,仰卧位 mini-PCNL 是一种更安全的替代治疗方法。关键词:经皮肾镜取石术;仰卧位;老年人;mini-PCNL;CCI 评分。

相似文献

1
Supine <em>versus</em> Prone Miniaturised Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Elderly Patients.仰卧位与俯卧位微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗老年患者的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022 Mar;32(3):340-345. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.03.340.
2
Does surgical position affect infective complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy?手术体位是否会影响经皮肾镜取石术的感染性并发症?
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec;50(6):765-771. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01367-6. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
Flank-Free Modified Supine Prone Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Treatment of Medium-Sized Renal Pelvic Stone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.侧卧位改良俯卧位超微经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小肾盂结石:一项随机临床试验。
J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1149-1154. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0016. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
4
Comparison Between Supine Position Versus Prone Position In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single Centered Analysis Of 623 Cases.经皮肾镜取石术中仰卧位与俯卧位的比较:623例单中心分析
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Oct-Dec;34(Suppl 1)(4):S1003-S1007. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-04-S4-11259.
5
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Horseshoe Kidneys: Results of a Multicentric Study.马蹄肾肾结石经皮肾镜碎石术:多中心研究结果。
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):979-984. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0128. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of patient with complex renal stone diseases.仰卧位与俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石病。
Urologia. 2024 Aug;91(3):558-562. doi: 10.1177/03915603241229801. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Optimal patient position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: Traditional prone or supine?马蹄肾患者行经皮肾镜取石术的最佳体位:传统的俯卧位还是仰卧位?
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Nov;46(9):565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
9
Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.仰卧位与俯卧位在经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石中的比较:一项Meta分析。
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):754-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0402. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Prone versus Barts “flank-free” modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a match-pair analysis.俯卧位与巴茨“无侧卧位”改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:配对分析。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Jun 28;51(3):1373-1379. doi: 10.3906/sag-2011-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of large kidney stones in the geriatric population.老年人群体中较大肾结石的处理。
World J Urol. 2023 Apr;41(4):981-992. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04333-y. Epub 2023 Mar 1.