Karpinski Katrin, Plachel Fabian, Gerhardt Christian, Saier Tim, Tauber Mark, Auffarth Alexander, Akgün Doruk, Moroder Philipp
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
St. Vincentius-Klinik Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):1096-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.043. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Rotator cuff lesions are a common shoulder pathology mainly affecting patients aged >50 years. This condition is accompanied by not only pain and loss of function but also impaired quality of life and psychological stress. A frequently employed treatment option is arthroscopic repair. But expectations regarding the outcome after surgery might differ between patients and surgeons and therefore lead to dissatisfaction on both sides. The aim of this study was to document patient expectations of a planned arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and compare the results with the assessment of shoulder surgeons.
A total of 303 patients and 25 surgeons were involved in this study. Patients with partial- or full-thickness tear of the rotator cuff scheduled for arthroscopic repair were included in this study. Preoperatively, they were asked to fill out questionnaires inquiring sociodemographic data, scores of the underlying pathology, as well as expectations regarding the operation with regard to pain relief, gain of range of motion and strength, as well as the effect on activities of daily life, work, and sports. Furthermore, 25 surgeons were surveyed on what they think their patients expected using the same standardized questions.
Among the patients, 43.9% considered gain of range of motion to be the most important goal after rotator cuff repair, followed by pain relief (30.6%) and gain of force (13.7%). Among the surgeons, 72% believed pain relief to be the most important for their patient followed by movement (20%) and strength (8%). When asked which parameter was the most important to achieve after operation, for patients, movement was on first place, pain second, and strength third. For shoulder specialists, the ranking was pain, movement, and strength. Surgeons significantly overrated pain relief when ranking against movement compared with their patients.
The expectations of patients regarding their operation differ from the surgeon's assessment. Whereas gaining range of motion was more important for patients, surgeons clearly voted for pain relief. Different expectations should therefore be discussed within the pretreatment interview and taken into account when planning the right therapy. This might lead to better satisfaction on both sides.
肩袖损伤是一种常见的肩部疾病,主要影响年龄大于50岁的患者。这种疾病不仅会导致疼痛和功能丧失,还会损害生活质量并造成心理压力。一种常用的治疗方法是关节镜修复术。但患者和外科医生对手术结果的期望可能存在差异,从而导致双方都不满意。本研究的目的是记录患者对计划进行的关节镜肩袖修复术的期望,并将结果与肩部外科医生的评估进行比较。
本研究共纳入303例患者和25名外科医生。计划进行关节镜修复术的肩袖部分或全层撕裂患者被纳入本研究。术前,要求他们填写问卷,询问社会人口统计学数据、基础疾病评分,以及对手术在缓解疼痛、增加活动范围和力量方面的期望,以及对日常生活、工作和运动的影响。此外,还对25名外科医生进行了调查,询问他们认为患者使用相同标准化问题的期望是什么。
在患者中,43.9%认为增加活动范围是肩袖修复术后最重要的目标,其次是缓解疼痛(30.6%)和增加力量(13.7%)。在外科医生中,72%认为缓解疼痛对患者最重要,其次是活动(20%)和力量(8%)。当被问及术后最重要的参数是什么时,对患者来说,活动排在第一位,疼痛第二位,力量第三位。对于肩部专家来说,排名是疼痛、活动和力量。与患者相比,外科医生在将疼痛缓解与活动进行排名时明显高估了疼痛缓解。
患者对手术的期望与外科医生的评估不同。对患者来说,增加活动范围更重要,而外科医生则明确选择缓解疼痛。因此,应在术前访谈中讨论不同的期望,并在规划合适的治疗方案时予以考虑。这可能会使双方都获得更高的满意度。