Maguey-González Jesús Adonai, Gómez-Rosales Sergio, Angeles Maria de Lourdes, López-Hernández Luis Humberto, Rodríguez-Hernández Elba, Solís-Cruz Bruno, Hernández-Patlán Daniel, Merino-Gúzman Rubén, Téllez-Isaías Guillermo
Posgrado en Ciencias de la Producción y de la Salud Animal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Unidad de Posgrado, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, Mexico; Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal (CENID - INIFAP), Km 1, carretera a Colon Ajuchitlán, Querétaro, Mexico.
Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Fisiología y Mejoramiento Animal (CENID - INIFAP), Km 1, carretera a Colon Ajuchitlán, Querétaro, Mexico.
Res Vet Sci. 2022 Jul;145:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
Humic acids (HA) have been evaluated as growth promoters in poultry, but their effects on the gut microbiota remains controversial using in vitro and in vivo models. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of HA extracted from a wormcompost on the recovery of bacteria: Salmonella Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) and Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) using an in vitro chicken digestive system. Independent in vitro trials were run for each bacteria using six treatments: 1) Negative control with no bacteria added (Control-), 2) Positive control added with bacteria (Control+), 3) 0.1% HA + bacteria, 4) 0.2% HA + bacteria, 5) 0.5% HA + bacteria and 6) 1% HA + bacteria. Data was subjected to analysis of variance and linear regression. In the crop, S. Enteritidis was lower, C. perfringes and B. subtilis were not affected by HA, while E. coli and L. salivarius were higher at 0.5 and 1% HA inclusion (P ≤ 0.0001). In the proventriculus, S. Enteritidis, E. coli and B. subtilis were higher at 0.5 and 1% HA inclusion (P ≤ 0.0001); C. perfringens and L. salivarius were not affected by HA. In intestine, significant increases of all bacteria strains were observed (P ≤ 0.0001). In conclusion, the results suggests that HA can be used as prebiotic, but their mechanisms of action to stimulate the growth of gut bacteria remains to be elucidated.
腐殖酸(HA)已被评估为家禽生长促进剂,但在体外和体内模型中,其对肠道微生物群的影响仍存在争议。本研究的目的是使用体外鸡消化系统,确定从蚯蚓堆肥中提取的HA对肠炎沙门氏菌(肠炎沙门氏菌)、大肠杆菌(大肠杆菌)、产气荚膜梭菌(产气荚膜梭菌)、枯草芽孢杆菌(枯草芽孢杆菌)和唾液乳杆菌(唾液乳杆菌)的恢复效果。针对每种细菌进行独立的体外试验,使用六种处理方法:1)不添加细菌的阴性对照(对照-),2)添加细菌的阳性对照(对照+),3)0.1%HA+细菌,4)0.2%HA+细菌,5)0.5%HA+细菌和6)1%HA+细菌。对数据进行方差分析和线性回归。在嗉囊中,肠炎沙门氏菌数量较低,产气荚膜梭菌和枯草芽孢杆菌不受HA影响,而在HA添加量为0.5%和1%时,大肠杆菌和唾液乳杆菌数量较高(P≤0.0001)。在前胃中,HA添加量为0.5%和1%时,肠炎沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌数量较高(P≤0.0001);产气荚膜梭菌和唾液乳杆菌不受HA影响。在肠道中,所有细菌菌株均显著增加(P≤0.0001)。总之,结果表明HA可作为益生元,但它们刺激肠道细菌生长的作用机制仍有待阐明。