Roque Dana M, Siegel Eric R, Buza Natalia, Bellone Stefania, Silasi Dan-Arin, Huang Gloria S, Andikyan Vaagn, Clark Mitchell, Azodi Masoud, Schwartz Peter E, Rao Gautam G, Reader Jocelyn C, Hui Pei, Tymon-Rosario Joan R, Harold Justin, Mauricio Dennis, Zeybek Burak, Menderes Gulden, Altwerger Gary, Ratner Elena, Santin Alessandro D
Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jun;126(12):1695-1703. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01717-6. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
This multi-center RP2 study assessed activity/safety of ixabepilone + bevacizumab compared to ixabepilone in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Additional objectives were to examine the role of prior bevacizumab and taxanes, and explore class III-ß-tubulin (TUBB3) as a predictive biomarker.
Participants were randomised to receive ixabepilone 20 mg/m days 1, 8, 15 with (IXA + BEV) or without (IXA) bevacizumab 10 mg/kg days 1, 15 every 28 days. Patients were stratified by prior BEV. The primary endpoint was PFS. OS, safety, and ORR served as secondary endpoints.
Among 76 evaluable patients who received IXA + BEV (n = 39) compared to IXA (n = 37), the ORR was 33% (n = 13) versus 8% (n = 3)(P = 0.004), durable at 6 months in 37% (n = 14) and 3% (n = 1) (P < 0.001). BEV significantly improved PFS (median:5.5 vs 2.2 months, HR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.55, P < 0.001) and OS (median:10.0 vs 6.0 months, HR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87, P = 0.006). Both regimens were well-tolerated. TUBB3 expression did not predict response. Subgroup analyses revealed minimal effect of prior BEV or taxane resistant/refractory status on response to IXA + BEV.
IXA + BEV is a well-tolerated, effective combination for platinum/taxane-resistant ovarian cancer that extends PFS and likely OS relative to IXA monotherapy. Prior receipt of BEV should not preclude the use of IXA + BEV. TUBB3 is not a predictive biomarker.
NCT3093155.
这项多中心RP2研究评估了伊沙匹隆联合贝伐单抗与伊沙匹隆单药相比,在铂耐药/难治性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌中的活性和安全性。其他目标是研究既往贝伐单抗和紫杉烷的作用,并探索Ⅲ类β微管蛋白(TUBB3)作为预测生物标志物。
参与者被随机分为两组,一组在第1、8、15天接受伊沙匹隆20mg/m²,联合(IXA + BEV)或不联合(IXA)贝伐单抗10mg/kg,第1、15天给药,每28天为一个周期。患者根据既往是否使用贝伐单抗进行分层。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。总生存期(OS)、安全性和客观缓解率(ORR)作为次要终点。
在76例可评估患者中,接受IXA + BEV(n = 39)的患者与接受IXA(n = 37)的患者相比,ORR分别为33%(n = 13)和8%(n = 3)(P = 0.004),6个月时持续缓解率分别为37%(n = 14)和3%(n = 1)(P < 0.001)。贝伐单抗显著改善了PFS(中位数:5.5个月 vs 2.2个月,HR = 0.33,95%CI 0.19 - 0.55,P < 0.001)和OS(中位数:10.0个月 vs 6.0个月,HR = 0.52,95%CI 0.31 - 0.87,P = 0.006)。两种治疗方案耐受性均良好。TUBB3表达不能预测疗效。亚组分析显示,既往使用贝伐单抗或紫杉烷耐药/难治状态对IXA + BEV的疗效影响极小。
与伊沙匹隆单药治疗相比,IXA + BEV是一种耐受性良好、有效的联合方案,可延长铂/紫杉烷耐药卵巢癌的PFS,并可能延长OS。既往接受过贝伐单抗治疗不应排除使用IXA + BEV。TUBB3不是预测生物标志物。
NCT3093155。