Suppr超能文献

使用抑郁、正电子发射断层扫描和莫达非尼进行的多角度选项生成研究。

A multi-pronged investigation of option generation using depression, PET and modafinil.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Brain. 2022 Jun 3;145(5):1854-1865. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab429.

Abstract

Option generation is a critical process in decision making, but previous studies have largely focused on choices between options given by a researcher. Consequently, how we self-generate options for behaviour remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated option generation in major depressive disorder and how dopamine might modulate this process, as well as the effects of modafinil (a putative cognitive enhancer) on option generation in healthy individuals. We first compared differences in self-generated options between healthy non-depressed adults [n = 44, age = 26.3 years (SD 5.9)] and patients with major depressive disorder [n = 54, age = 24.8 years (SD 7.4)]. In the second study, a subset of depressed individuals [n = 22, age = 25.6 years (SD 7.8)] underwent PET scans with 11C-raclopride to examine the relationships between dopamine D2/D3 receptor availability and individual differences in option generation. Finally, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study of modafinil (100 mg and 200 mg), was conducted in an independent sample of healthy people [n = 19, age = 23.2 years (SD 4.8)] to compare option generation under different doses of this drug. The first study revealed that patients with major depressive disorder produced significantly fewer options [t(96) = 2.68, P = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.54], albeit with greater uniqueness [t(96) = -2.54, P = 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.52], on the option generation task compared to healthy controls. In the second study, we found that 11C-raclopride binding potential in the putamen was negatively correlated with fluency (r = -0.69, P = 0.001) but positively associated with uniqueness (r = 0.59, P = 0.007). Hence, depressed individuals with higher densities of unoccupied putamen D2/D3 receptors in the putamen generated fewer but more unique options, whereas patients with lower D2/D3 receptor availability were likely to produce a larger number of similar options. Finally, healthy participants were less unique [F(2,36) = 3.32, P = 0.048, partial η2 = 0.16] and diverse [F(2,36) = 4.31, P = 0.021, partial η2 = 0.19] after taking 200 mg versus 100 mg and 0 mg of modafinil, while fluency increased linearly with dosage at a trend level [F(1,18) = 4.11, P = 0.058, partial η2 = 0.19]. Our results show, for the first time, that option generation is affected in clinical depression and that dopaminergic activity in the putamen of patients with major depressive disorder may play a key role in the self-generation of options. Modafinil was also found to influence option generation in healthy people by reducing the creativity of options produced.

摘要

选项生成是决策过程中的一个关键步骤,但以前的研究主要集中在研究人员提供的选项之间的选择上。因此,我们如何为行为自我生成选项仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了重度抑郁症患者的选项生成以及多巴胺如何调节这一过程,以及莫达非尼(一种假定的认知增强剂)对健康个体选项生成的影响。

我们首先比较了健康非抑郁成年人[ n = 44,年龄= 26.3 岁(SD 5.9)]和重度抑郁症患者[ n = 54,年龄= 24.8 岁(SD 7.4)]之间自我生成选项的差异。在第二项研究中,一部分抑郁患者[ n = 22,年龄= 25.6 岁(SD 7.8)]接受了 11C-racopride PET 扫描,以检查多巴胺 D2/D3 受体可用性与个体差异之间的关系在选项生成中。最后,一项在独立的健康人群样本中进行的莫达非尼(100mg 和 200mg)的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、三向交叉研究比较了在不同剂量的这种药物下的选项生成。

第一项研究表明,与健康对照组相比,重度抑郁症患者在选项生成任务中产生的选项明显减少[ t(96)= 2.68,P = 0.009,Cohen's d = 0.54],尽管其独特性更高[ t(96)= -2.54,P = 0.01,Cohen's d = 0.52]。在第二项研究中,我们发现纹状体中的 11C-racopride 结合潜力与流畅度呈负相关( r = -0.69,P = 0.001),但与独特性呈正相关( r = 0.59,P = 0.007)。因此,纹状体中多巴胺 D2/D3 受体占有率较高的抑郁患者生成的选项较少但更独特,而多巴胺 D2/D3 受体可用性较低的患者则更有可能产生大量相似的选项。最后,健康参与者在服用 200mg 莫达非尼后,独特性[ F(2,36)= 3.32,P = 0.048,部分η2 = 0.16]和多样性[ F(2,36)= 4.31,P = 0.021,部分η2 = 0.19]降低,而流畅度呈线性增加趋势[ F(1,18)= 4.11,P = 0.058,部分η2 = 0.19]。

我们的研究结果首次表明,选项生成在临床抑郁症中受到影响,而纹状体中的多巴胺活性可能在重度抑郁症患者的自我生成选项中起着关键作用。莫达非尼还被发现通过降低产生的选项的创造性来影响健康人的选项生成。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Dopamine Modulates Dynamic Decision-Making during Foraging.多巴胺调节觅食过程中的动态决策。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;40(27):5273-5282. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2586-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Dopamine Modulates Option Generation for Behavior.多巴胺调节行为的选择生成。
Curr Biol. 2018 May 21;28(10):1561-1569.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.069. Epub 2018 May 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验