Kunz Coyne Ashlan J, El Ghali Amer, Holger Dana, Rebold Nicholas, Rybak Michael J
Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Apr;11(2):661-682. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00591-2. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are frequent causes of serious nosocomial infections that may compromise the selection of antimicrobial therapy. The goal of this review is to summarize recent epidemiologic, microbiologic, and clinical data pertinent to the therapeutic management of patients with infections caused by MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa. Historically, conventional antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics have been used for the empiric treatment of MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa. Owing to the remarkable capacity of P. aeruginosa to confer resistance via multiple mechanisms, these traditional therapies are often rendered ineffective. To increase the likelihood of administering empiric antipseudomonal therapy with in vitro activity, a second agent from a different antibiotic class is often administered concomitantly with a traditional antipseudomonal β-lactam. However, combination therapy may pose an increased risk of antibiotic toxicity and secondary infection, notably, Clostridioides difficile. Multiple novel agents that demonstrate in vitro activity against MDR-P. aeruginosa (e.g., β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol) have been recently granted US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and are promising additions to the antipseudomonal armamentarium. Even so, comparative clinical data pertaining to these novel agents is sparse, and concerns surrounding the scarcity of antibiotics active against refractory MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa necessitates continued assessment of alternative therapies. This is particularly important in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who may be chronically colonized and suffer from recurrent infections and disease exacerbations due in part to limited efficacious antipseudomonal agents. Bacteriophages represent a promising candidate for combatting recurrent and refractory infections with their ability to target specific host bacteria and circumvent traditional mechanisms of antibiotic resistance seen in MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa. Future goals for the management of these infections include increased comparator clinical data of novel agents to determine in what scenario certain agents may be preferred over others. Until then, appropriate treatment of these infections requires a thorough evaluation of patient- and infection-specific factors to guide empiric and definitive therapeutic decisions.
多重耐药(MDR)和广泛耐药(XDR)铜绿假单胞菌分离株是严重医院感染的常见原因,这可能会影响抗菌治疗的选择。本综述的目的是总结与MDR/XDR铜绿假单胞菌感染患者治疗管理相关的最新流行病学、微生物学和临床数据。从历史上看,传统的抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类抗生素一直用于MDR/XDR铜绿假单胞菌的经验性治疗。由于铜绿假单胞菌通过多种机制产生耐药性的能力很强,这些传统疗法往往无效。为了提高给予具有体外活性的经验性抗假单胞菌治疗的可能性,通常会将另一种不同抗生素类别的药物与传统的抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物联合使用。然而,联合治疗可能会增加抗生素毒性和继发感染的风险,尤其是艰难梭菌感染。多种对MDR铜绿假单胞菌具有体外活性的新型药物(如β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合和头孢地尔)最近已获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,有望成为抗假单胞菌药物库的补充。即便如此,关于这些新型药物的比较临床数据仍然很少,而且由于针对难治性MDR/XDR铜绿假单胞菌的有效抗生素稀缺,有必要继续评估替代疗法。这在囊性纤维化(CF)患者中尤为重要,他们可能会长期定植该菌,并因有效的抗假单胞菌药物有限而反复感染和病情加重。噬菌体因其能够靶向特定宿主细菌并规避MDR/XDR铜绿假单胞菌中常见的传统抗生素耐药机制,成为对抗复发性和难治性感染的有希望的候选者。这些感染管理的未来目标包括增加新型药物的比较临床数据,以确定在何种情况下某些药物可能比其他药物更受青睐。在此之前,对这些感染进行适当治疗需要全面评估患者和感染的特定因素,以指导经验性和确定性治疗决策。