• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化男女粪便免疫化学检测筛查 - 来自芬兰的成本效益分析。

Optimizing screening with faecal immunochemical test for both sexes - Cost-effectiveness analysis from Finland.

机构信息

Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Public Health, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O.Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2022 Apr;157:106990. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106990. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106990
PMID:35150749
Abstract

A faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening pilot was introduced in Finland in 2019 with sex-specific screening strategies. This study aims to model cost-effectiveness of sex-specific strategies for the whole population, and to assess whether the current strategies are optimal. We developed separate MISCAN-Colon models, including different FIT performances, for the Finnish men and women using the first-year data of the FIT screening pilot. We evaluated 180 FIT strategies varying in FIT cut-off, screening interval, age to start, and age to stop screening, and compared them to no-screening by sex. We used incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to identify the optimal strategy after combining all male and female strategies and restricting the analysis by costs and referral rate to diagnostic colonoscopies. Offering annual FIT screening with a cut-off of 25 μg/g at 50-79 years in men and with a cut-off of 10 μg/g at 55-69 years in women was optimal. This combined strategy prevented 28% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and 55% of CRC deaths with acceptable costs (ICER = 9000€/life-years gained). Screening at the current target age of 60-74 years was suboptimal for both sexes. Among strategies with the same target age and interval for both sexes, expected benefits from optimal screening were lower but still reasonable. Our results support a wider age range of screening in men, and a lower cut-off for a positive test in women when restrictions on colonoscopy capacity and costs are in place. National FIT screening program should start at younger age.

摘要

芬兰于 2019 年引入了粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)筛查试点项目,并采用了针对不同性别的筛查策略。本研究旨在为全人群建立针对不同性别策略的成本效益模型,并评估当前策略是否最优。我们使用 FIT 筛查试点项目的第一年数据,为芬兰男性和女性分别开发了包含不同 FIT 性能的 MISCAN-Colon 模型。我们评估了 180 种 FIT 策略,这些策略在 FIT 截止值、筛查间隔、开始筛查的年龄和停止筛查的年龄等方面存在差异,并通过按性别进行无筛查比较来评估这些策略。我们使用增量成本效益比(ICER)来确定最优策略,方法是将所有男性和女性的策略结合起来,并通过将分析限制在成本和转诊至诊断性结肠镜检查的比例范围内来进行。在男性中,采用 50-79 岁时截止值为 25μg/g、每年进行 FIT 筛查,在女性中,采用 55-69 岁时截止值为 10μg/g 的筛查策略是最优的。这种联合策略可预防 28%的结直肠癌(CRC)病例和 55%的 CRC 死亡,且成本可接受(ICER=9000 欧元/生命年获益)。对于男性和女性,当前 60-74 岁的目标年龄筛查均不是最优的。在具有相同目标年龄和性别间隔的策略中,最优筛查的预期获益较低,但仍在合理范围内。我们的研究结果支持扩大男性的筛查年龄范围,并在考虑结肠镜检查能力和成本限制的情况下,降低女性阳性检测的截止值。国家 FIT 筛查计划应在更年轻时启动。

相似文献

1
Optimizing screening with faecal immunochemical test for both sexes - Cost-effectiveness analysis from Finland.优化男女粪便免疫化学检测筛查 - 来自芬兰的成本效益分析。
Prev Med. 2022 Apr;157:106990. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106990. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?使用粪便免疫化学检测的基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目:粪便血红蛋白临界值应因年龄和性别而异吗?
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3555-3.
3
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
4
Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)肠癌筛查项目中,与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验相比,不同阳性阈值下粪便免疫化学检测的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 27;7(10):e017186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017186.
5
Optimising colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: a modelling study.优化中国上海结直肠癌筛查:模型研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 16;12(5):e048156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048156.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.粪便免疫化学检测联合或不联合息肉切除术后监测结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):544-554. doi: 10.7326/M16-2891. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in a low incidence country: The case of Saudi Arabia.在低发国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析:以沙特阿拉伯为例。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul-Aug;27(4):208-216. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_526_20.
9
Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学检测的优化使用:一项使用日本数据的成本效益分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;46(2):116-25. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv186. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Gender-specific cut-off levels in colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical test: A population-based study of colonoscopy findings and costs.粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查的性别特异性截断值:基于人群的结肠镜检查结果和成本研究。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):439-447. doi: 10.1177/09691413211020035. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in the New Zealand Bowel Screening Pilot.新西兰肠道筛查试验中阴性粪便免疫化学试验后的间隔期结肠癌。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 24;10(1):e001233. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001233.
2
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Europe: Have Studies Included Optimal Screening Intensities?欧洲结直肠癌筛查成本效益分析的系统评价:研究是否纳入了最佳筛查强度?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Sep;21(5):701-717. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00819-3. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Improved use of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in the Scottish bowel screening programme.
提高粪便免疫化学试验在苏格兰肠道筛查计划中检测血红蛋白的应用。
J Med Screen. 2023 Dec;30(4):184-190. doi: 10.1177/09691413231175611. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌(CRC)筛查对降低全因死亡率和CRC特异性死亡率的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;15(7):1948. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071948.