Desmedt Olivier, Heeren Alexandre, Corneille Olivier, Luminet Olivier
Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Fund for Scientific Research - Belgium (FRS-FNRS), Belgium.
Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Fund for Scientific Research - Belgium (FRS-FNRS), Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Biol Psychol. 2022 Mar;169:108289. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108289. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Recent conceptualizations of interoception suggest several facets to this construct, including "interoceptive sensibility" and "self-report interoceptive scales", both of which are assessed with questionnaires. Although these conceptual efforts have helped move the field forward, uncertainty remains regarding whether current measures converge on their measurement of a common construct. To address this question, we first identified -via a systematic review- the most cited questionnaires of interoceptive sensibility. Then, we examined their correlations, their overall factorial structure, and their network structure in a large community sample (n = 1003). The results indicate that these questionnaires tap onto distinct constructs, with low overall convergence and interrelationships between questionnaire items. This observation mitigates the interpretation and replicability of findings in self-report interoception research. We call for a better match between constructs and measures.
最近对内感受的概念化研究表明,这一概念包含几个方面,包括“内感受敏感性”和“自我报告内感受量表”,这两者均通过问卷调查进行评估。尽管这些概念性的努力推动了该领域的发展,但目前对于这些测量方法是否能就共同概念的测量达成一致仍存在不确定性。为了解决这个问题,我们首先通过系统综述确定了被引用最多的内感受敏感性调查问卷。然后,我们在一个大型社区样本(n = 1003)中检验了它们之间的相关性、整体因子结构和网络结构。结果表明,这些问卷所涉及的是不同的概念,问卷项目之间的总体收敛性和相互关系较低。这一观察结果降低了自我报告内感受研究中结果的解释性和可重复性。我们呼吁在概念和测量方法之间实现更好的匹配。