• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾听你的内心——内脏感知准确性、意识和敏感性的生态瞬间评估:一项初步研究。

Listen to Your Heart-Ecological Momentary Assessment of Interoceptive Accuracy, Awareness and Sensibility: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 4;18(9):4893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094893.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18094893
PMID:34064438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8124337/
Abstract

Interoception is a multi-facetted phenomenon including interoceptive accuracy, awareness and sensibility. Deficits in interoception have been associated with psychological distress. However, little is known about the course of interoception over time. The present study aimed at examining interoception in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA)-setting. A seven-day smartphone-based EMA was conducted in a community sample of sixty-one participants (age: = 24.1, = 7.00, = 54 female (88.5%)). To control for potential practice effects of repeated assessments during the EMA phase, participants were randomly assigned to a control ( = 30) and an interoception ( = 31) group. The latter was assessed for interoceptive accuracy, awareness and sensibility. Before and after the EMA phase, all participants were assessed for interoception in the laboratory. Multilevel analyses revealed significant fluctuations for all three interoceptive facets, around 50% of variance was due to within-person variability. There were only practice effects for the subscale "Attention Regulation", measuring interoceptive sensibility. The facets of interoception can be assessed in an EMA-setting. Repeated interoceptive assessments do not necessarily lead to an improvement of participants' interoceptive abilities. It could be shown that all interoceptive facets fluctuate, which should be considered in future research.

摘要

内感受是一种多方面的现象,包括内感受准确性、意识和敏感性。内感受缺陷与心理困扰有关。然而,关于内感受随时间的变化过程知之甚少。本研究旨在通过生态瞬时评估 (EMA) 来检查内感受。在社区样本的 61 名参与者(年龄:= 24.1,= 7.00,= 54 名女性(88.5%))中进行了为期七天的基于智能手机的 EMA。为了控制 EMA 阶段重复评估的潜在练习效应,参与者被随机分配到对照组(= 30)和内感受组(= 31)。后者被评估内感受准确性、意识和敏感性。在 EMA 阶段之前和之后,所有参与者都在实验室中评估内感受。多层次分析显示,所有三个内感受方面都有显著波动,约 50%的方差归因于个体内变异性。只有“注意调节”子量表的评估存在练习效应,该子量表衡量内感受敏感性。内感受的各个方面可以在 EMA 环境中进行评估。重复的内感受评估不一定会提高参与者的内感受能力。研究表明,所有的内感受方面都存在波动,这在未来的研究中应该得到考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/b3d3bba5d6e6/ijerph-18-04893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/739be6ca2c6c/ijerph-18-04893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/bdb3918c04ea/ijerph-18-04893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/efe92bee291e/ijerph-18-04893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/b3d3bba5d6e6/ijerph-18-04893-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/739be6ca2c6c/ijerph-18-04893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/bdb3918c04ea/ijerph-18-04893-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/efe92bee291e/ijerph-18-04893-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c8a/8124337/b3d3bba5d6e6/ijerph-18-04893-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Listen to Your Heart-Ecological Momentary Assessment of Interoceptive Accuracy, Awareness and Sensibility: A Pilot Study.倾听你的内心——内脏感知准确性、意识和敏感性的生态瞬间评估:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 4;18(9):4893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094893.
2
Making sense of what you sense: Disentangling interoceptive awareness, sensibility and accuracy.理解你的感知:厘清内感受性觉知、敏感性和准确性。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Nov;109:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
3
Do interoceptive accuracy and interoceptive sensibility predict emotion regulation?内感受准确性和内感受敏感性是否可以预测情绪调节?
Psychol Res. 2021 Jul;85(5):1894-1908. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01369-2. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness.了解自己的内心:区分内感受准确性与内感受意识。
Biol Psychol. 2015 Jan;104:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
The misjudgment of interoceptive awareness: Systematic overrating of interoceptive awareness among individuals with lower interoceptive metacognitive skills.内感受意识判断失误:内感受元认知技能较低的个体对内感受意识存在系统性高估。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Jan;117:103621. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103621. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Feeling the urge: Using ecological momentary assessment to test the relationship of interoception with disordered eating and nonsuicidal self-injury.有冲动感:使用生态瞬时评估来测试内感受与饮食失调和非自杀性自伤的关系。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Jan;132(1):78-90. doi: 10.1037/abn0000794. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
7
Differentiating attention styles and regulatory aspects of self-reported interoceptive sensibility.区分自我报告的内感受敏感性的注意力风格和调节方面。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0013. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
8
Level-2 visuo-spatial perspective-taking and interoception - More evidence for the embodiment of perspective-taking.二级视空间观点采择和内感受——观点采择具身化的更多证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 27;14(6):e0219005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219005. eCollection 2019.
9
The Relationship Between Functional Connectivity and Interoceptive Sensibility.功能连接与内感受敏感性之间的关系
Brain Connect. 2022 Jun;12(5):417-431. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0777. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
Interoception is associated with anxiety and depression in pregnant women: A pilot study.孕妇的内感受与焦虑和抑郁有关:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 6;17(5):e0267507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267507. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Interoceptive attention and mood in daily life: an experience-sampling study.内感受注意与日常生活中的情绪:一项经验取样研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Aug 26;379(1908):20230256. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0256. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Effects of a Chatbot-Based Intervention on Stress and Health-Related Parameters in a Stressed Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于聊天机器人的干预对压力样本中应激和健康相关参数的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 28;11:e50454. doi: 10.2196/50454.
3
Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders.

本文引用的文献

1
Interoceptive Abnormalities and Suicidality: A Systematic Review.内感受异常与自杀倾向:系统综述。
Behav Ther. 2021 Sep;52(5):1035-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Do Feelings of Defeat and Entrapment Change over Time? An Investigation of the Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour Using Ecological Momentary Assessments.挫败感和被困感会随时间变化吗?使用生态瞬时评估对自杀行为的综合动机-意志模型的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134685.
3
Diminished responses to bodily threat and blunted interoception in suicide attempters.
饮食失调中的感知功能障碍。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024 May 11. doi: 10.1007/7854_2024_470.
4
A chatbot-based intervention with ELME to improve stress and health-related parameters in a stressed sample: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一项基于聊天机器人的干预措施,结合情绪调节学习模块(ELME),以改善处于压力状态样本中的压力及与健康相关参数:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Mar 1;5:1046202. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1046202. eCollection 2023.
5
Do Feelings of Defeat and Entrapment Change over Time? An Investigation of the Integrated Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour Using Ecological Momentary Assessments.挫败感和被困感会随时间变化吗?使用生态瞬时评估对自杀行为的综合动机-意志模型的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134685.
自杀未遂者对身体威胁的反应减弱及内感受迟钝。
Elife. 2020 Apr 7;9:e51593. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51593.
4
Affect fluctuations examined with ecological momentary assessment in patients with current or remitted depression and anxiety disorders.当前或缓解的抑郁和焦虑障碍患者使用生态瞬时评估检查情绪波动。
Psychol Med. 2021 Aug;51(11):1906-1915. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000689. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Comment on "Zamariola et al. (2018), Interoceptive Accuracy Scores are Problematic: Evidence from Simple Bivariate Correlations"-The empirical data base, the conceptual reasoning and the analysis behind this statement are misconceived and do not support the authors' conclusions.评 Zamariola 等人(2018)的《内感受准确性评分存在问题:来自简单二元相关的证据》-该论述背后的实证数据库、概念推理和分析存在误解,并不支持作者的结论。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Apr;152:107870. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107870. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Interoceptive deficits differentiate suicide groups and associate with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in a military sample.内感受缺陷将自杀群体区分开来,并与军事样本中的自残思想和行为相关联。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Apr;50(2):472-489. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12603. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Sense it and use it: interoceptive accuracy and sensibility in suicide ideators.感知并利用它:自杀意念者的内感受准确性和敏感性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2322-1.
8
Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study.腕戴活动追踪器在实验室和自由生活环境中心率测量:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 2;7(10):e14120. doi: 10.2196/14120.
9
Major Depressive Disorder Is Associated with Impaired Interoceptive Accuracy: A Systematic Review.重度抑郁症与内感受准确性受损相关:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2019 Jun 6;9(6):131. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9060131.
10
An Active Inference Approach to Interoceptive Psychopathology.主动推理方法对内脏知觉病理学的研究
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:97-122. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095617.