Lavigne T, Sciumè G, Laporte S, Pillet H, Urcun S, Wheatley B, Rohan P-Y
Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, IBHGC, 151 bd de l'hopital, Paris, 75013, France; Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Univ. of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, Avenue d'Aquitaine, Pessac, 33607, France.
Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Univ. of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, Avenue d'Aquitaine, Pessac, 33607, France.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022 Mar;93:105592. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105592. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
Pressure-induced tissue strain is one major pathway for Pressure Ulcer development and, especially, Deep Tissue Injury. Biomechanical investigation of the time-dependent stress-strain mechanical behaviour of skeletal muscle tissue is therefore essential. In the literature, a viscoelastic formulation is generally assumed for the experimental characterization of skeletal muscles, with the limitation that the underlying physical mechanisms that give rise to the time dependent stress-strain behaviour are not known. The objective of this study is to explore the capability of poroelasticity to reproduce the apparent viscoelastic behaviour of passive muscle tissue under confined compression.
Experimental stress-relaxation response of 31 cylindrical porcine samples tested under fast and slow confined compression by Vaidya and collaborators were used. An axisymmetric Finite Element model was developed in ABAQUS and, for each sample a one-to-one inverse analysis was performed to calibrate the specimen-specific constitutive parameters, namely, the drained Young's modulus, the void ratio, hydraulic permeability, the Poisson's ratio, the solid grain's and fluid's bulk moduli.
The peak stress and consolidation were recovered for most of the samples (N=25) by the poroelastic model (normalised root-mean-square error ≤0.03 for fast and slow confined compression conditions).
The strength of the proposed model is its fewer number of variables (N=6 for the proposed poroelastic model versus N=18 for the viscohyperelastic model proposed by Vaidya and collaborators). The incorporation of poroelasticity to clinical models of Pessure Ulcer formation could lead to more precise and mechanistic explorations of soft tissue injury risk factors.
压力诱导的组织应变是压疮尤其是深部组织损伤形成的主要途径之一。因此,对骨骼肌组织随时间变化的应力应变力学行为进行生物力学研究至关重要。在文献中,通常假定采用粘弹性公式来对骨骼肌进行实验表征,但存在的局限性是,导致随时间变化的应力应变行为的潜在物理机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨多孔弹性理论再现被动肌肉组织在受限压缩下表观粘弹性行为的能力。
使用了Vaidya及其合作者在快速和慢速受限压缩条件下测试的31个圆柱形猪肌肉样本的实验应力松弛响应。在ABAQUS中开发了一个轴对称有限元模型,对每个样本进行一对一的反分析,以校准特定样本的本构参数,即排水杨氏模量、孔隙率、水力渗透率、泊松比、固体颗粒和流体的体积模量。
多孔弹性模型恢复了大多数样本(N = 25)的峰值应力和固结情况(快速和慢速受限压缩条件下的归一化均方根误差≤0.03)。
所提出模型的优势在于其变量数量较少(所提出的多孔弹性模型有6个变量,而Vaidya及其合作者提出的粘超弹性模型有18个变量)。将多孔弹性理论纳入压疮形成的临床模型中,可能会对软组织损伤风险因素进行更精确和基于机制的探索。