Prehospital and Hospital Emergency Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Prehospital and Hospital Emergency Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;54:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
Ketamine is known to be an effective factor in reducing pain without significant side effects.
One of the limited side effects of Ketamine is agitation. Due to the reduction of this symptom with Haloperidol, we decided to design a randomized clinical trial to compare the analgesic effect of Ketamine with Haloperidol and Fentanyl in reducing acute pain and its complications.
In this study, 200 adult patients who presented to the emergency department with acute pain are examined. They are randomly divided into two groups. One group received intravenous Ketamine with Haloperidol and the other group received intravenous Fentanyl. Patients are then compared for their pain score before and after administration of the drugs, as well as the side effects they experienced.
There was no significant difference between the mean scores of initial pain in the two groups, but at all intervals of 5, 10, 15 and 30 min after injection, the mean of pain scores of patients in the group receiving Ketamine and Haloperidol were lower. The need for injection of rescue analgesic was 9% in the Ketamine and Haloperidol group and 34% in the Fentanyl group. The mean agitation score did not differ between the two groups except in the tenth minute. At tenth minute, the mean agitation score of the Ketamine group was higher.
Ketamine works better than fentanyl in controlling acute pain, and limited side effect of agitation can be controlled if injected with haloperidol. Due to its better function and fewer side effects, it seems that in controlling acute pain, Ketamine along with Haloperidol can be a good alternative to opioids.
氯胺酮被认为是一种有效减轻疼痛且无明显副作用的因素。
氯胺酮的有限副作用之一是激越。由于氟哌啶醇可减少这种症状,我们决定设计一项随机临床试验,比较氯胺酮与氟哌啶醇和芬太尼在减轻急性疼痛及其并发症方面的镇痛效果。
本研究共纳入 200 名因急性疼痛到急诊科就诊的成年患者。他们被随机分为两组。一组患者接受静脉注射氯胺酮和氟哌啶醇,另一组患者接受静脉注射芬太尼。然后比较两组患者给药前后的疼痛评分以及他们经历的副作用。
两组患者初始疼痛评分的平均值无显著差异,但在注射后 5、10、15 和 30 分钟的所有时间间隔,接受氯胺酮和氟哌啶醇治疗的患者的疼痛评分平均值均较低。需要注射解救性镇痛药物的患者,在氯胺酮和氟哌啶醇组中占 9%,在芬太尼组中占 34%。两组患者的平均激越评分无差异,除第 10 分钟外。在第 10 分钟,氯胺酮组的平均激越评分较高。
与芬太尼相比,氯胺酮在控制急性疼痛方面效果更好,如果与氟哌啶醇一起注射,可控制其有限的激越副作用。由于其更好的功能和更少的副作用,在控制急性疼痛方面,氯胺酮联合氟哌啶醇似乎可以替代阿片类药物。