• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊中使用镇痛和亚分离剂量氯胺酮治疗急性疼痛的疗效。

Efficacy of analgesic and sub-dissociative dose ketamine for acute pain in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.

Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.026. Epub 2023 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.026
PMID:37290249
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute pain accounts for over 70% of Emergency Department (ED) visits. Sub-dissociative dose ketamine (0.1-0.6 mg/kg) is safe and effective for the management of acute pain in the ED. However, the optimal dose of intravenous ketamine that provides effective analgesia and minimizes the risk of adverse effects has yet to be identified. The objective of this study was to describe an effective analgesia dose range of IV ketamine for acute pain in the ED.

METHODS

This multi-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients who received analgesic and sub-dissociative dose ketamine for the management of acute pain between May 5, 2018, and August 30, 2021, in 21 emergency departments at academic, community, and critical access hospitals across four states. Patients were excluded if they received ketamine for an indication other than pain, such as procedural sedation or intubation, or for whom there was incomplete documentation for the primary outcome. Patients who received a ketamine dose <0.3 mg/kg were stratified into the low-dose group, and those who received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg or higher to the high-dose group. The primary outcome was change in pain scores within 60 min using a standard 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included incidence of adverse effects and use of rescue analgesics. Continuous variables were compared between dose groups using student t-test or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. Linear regression was used to assess the association between the change in NRS pain scores within 60 min and dose after adjusting for baseline pain, requiring an additional dose of ketamine, and receiving an opioid.

RESULTS

From 3796 patient encounters screened for receipt of ketamine, 384 patients met inclusion criteria including 258 in the low-dose group, and 126 in the high-dose group. The primary reason for exclusion was incomplete documentation of pain scores, or ketamine used for sedation. Median baseline pain scores were 8.2 in the low-dose group and 7.8 in the high-dose group (difference 0.5; 95% CI 0 to 1, p = 0.04). Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in their mean NRS pain scores within 60 min following the first administration of IV ketamine. There were no differences in the change in pain scores between both groups (-2.2 vs -2.6, mean difference 0.4, 95% CI -0.4 to 1.1, p = 0.34). Use of rescue analgesics (40.7% vs 36.5%, p = 0.43) and adverse effects were similar between groups, including early discontinuation of the ketamine infusion (37.2% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.99). Overall, the most common adverse effects were agitation (7.3%) and nausea (7.0%).

CONCLUSION

The analgesic efficacy and safety of high-dose sub-dissociative ketamine (≥0.3 mg/kg) was not superior to low-dose (< 0.3 mg/kg) for the management of acute pain in the ED. Low-dose ketamine <0.3 mg/kg is an effective and safe pain management strategy in this population.

摘要

背景

急性疼痛占急诊科(ED)就诊的 70%以上。亚分离剂量氯胺酮(0.1-0.6mg/kg)可安全有效地用于治疗 ED 中的急性疼痛。然而,提供有效镇痛作用且最小化不良反应风险的最佳静脉内氯胺酮剂量尚未确定。本研究的目的是描述亚分离剂量氯胺酮在 ED 急性疼痛中的有效镇痛剂量范围。

方法

这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,评估了 2018 年 5 月 5 日至 2021 年 8 月 30 日期间在四个州的 21 家学术、社区和关键通道医院的急诊科接受镇痛和亚分离剂量氯胺酮治疗的成年患者。如果患者因疼痛以外的其他指征接受氯胺酮治疗,例如程序镇静或插管,或者主要结局的记录不完整,则将其排除在外。接受剂量 <0.3mg/kg 氯胺酮的患者分为低剂量组,接受剂量为 0.3mg/kg 或更高剂量的患者分为高剂量组。主要结局是使用标准 11 点数字评分量表(NRS)在 60min 内疼痛评分的变化。次要结局包括不良反应的发生率和使用解救性镇痛药。使用学生 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较剂量组之间的连续变量。使用线性回归评估 60min 内 NRS 疼痛评分变化与剂量之间的关联,同时调整基线疼痛、需要额外剂量的氯胺酮和使用阿片类药物。

结果

在筛查接受氯胺酮治疗的 3796 例患者中,有 384 例符合纳入标准,包括低剂量组 258 例,高剂量组 126 例。排除的主要原因是疼痛评分记录不完整,或氯胺酮用于镇静。低剂量组和高剂量组的中位基线疼痛评分分别为 8.2 和 7.8(差异 0.5;95%CI 0 至 1,p=0.04)。两组患者在首次静脉内给予氯胺酮后 60min 内的平均 NRS 疼痛评分均显著降低。两组之间疼痛评分的变化没有差异(-2.2 与-2.6,平均差异 0.4,95%CI -0.4 至 1.1,p=0.34)。解救性镇痛药的使用(40.7% 与 36.5%,p=0.43)和不良反应在两组之间相似,包括氯胺酮输注早期停止(37.2% 与 37.3%,p=0.99)。总体而言,最常见的不良反应是激越(7.3%)和恶心(7.0%)。

结论

高剂量亚分离氯胺酮(≥0.3mg/kg)的镇痛效果和安全性并不优于低剂量(<0.3mg/kg),用于治疗 ED 中的急性疼痛。低剂量(<0.3mg/kg)氯胺酮是该人群中有效且安全的疼痛管理策略。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of analgesic and sub-dissociative dose ketamine for acute pain in the emergency department.急诊中使用镇痛和亚分离剂量氯胺酮治疗急性疼痛的疗效。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.026. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Low-dose ketamine improves pain relief in patients receiving intravenous opioids for acute pain in the emergency department: results of a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.低剂量氯胺酮可改善急诊科接受静脉注射阿片类药物治疗急性疼痛患者的疼痛缓解情况:一项随机、双盲临床试验的结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;21(11):1193-202. doi: 10.1111/acem.12510.
3
A prospective randomized, double-dummy trial comparing IV push low dose ketamine to short infusion of low dose ketamine for treatment of  pain in the ED.一项前瞻性随机双盲试验,比较静脉推注低剂量氯胺酮与短时间输注低剂量氯胺酮用于急诊科疼痛治疗的效果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1095-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
4
High- versus low-dose ketamine for analgesia in older adults in the emergency department.高剂量与低剂量氯胺酮用于急诊科老年患者的镇痛。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;86:120-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.10.015. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
5
A randomized, noninferiority, controlled trial of two doses of intravenous subdissociative ketamine for analgesia in the emergency department.一项静脉注射亚分离型氯胺酮两种剂量用于急诊科镇痛的随机、非劣效性对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;28(6):647-654. doi: 10.1111/acem.14200. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Low-dose ketamine versus morphine in the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department: A meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials.低剂量氯胺酮与吗啡在急诊科急性疼痛治疗中的比较:15 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;76:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.056. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
7
Low dose ketamine versus morphine for acute severe vaso occlusive pain in children: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量氯胺酮与吗啡治疗儿童急性重度血管闭塞性疼痛的随机对照试验。
Scand J Pain. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):19-27. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0140.
8
Low-dose Ketamine Does Not Improve Migraine in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.低剂量氯胺酮对急诊科偏头痛无效:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):952-960. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.37875. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
9
Intravenous subdissociative-dose ketamine versus morphine for acute geriatric pain in the Emergency Department: A randomized controlled trial.静脉亚分离剂量氯胺酮与吗啡治疗急诊科急性老年疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Low-dose ketamine vs morphine for acute pain in the ED: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量氯胺酮与吗啡用于急诊科急性疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.058. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse Effects Associated With High-Dose Ketamine Infusions For Refractory Pain And Psychiatric Conditions.高剂量氯胺酮输注治疗难治性疼痛和精神疾病的不良反应
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jun 19;29(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s11916-025-01408-w.
2
The 90% effective dose of ciprofol and propofol with S-ketamine for painless abortion: a randomized, double-blind, sequential dose-finding trial.环丙泊酚与丙泊酚联合S-氯胺酮用于无痛人流的90%有效剂量:一项随机、双盲、序贯剂量探索试验。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 Mar 24;16:20420986251328673. doi: 10.1177/20420986251328673. eCollection 2025.
3
[Not Available].
[无可用内容]
Tunis Med. 2024 Nov 5;102(11):886-892. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i11.4574.
4
Ketamine Compared With Morphine for Out-of-Hospital Analgesia for Patients With Traumatic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.氯胺酮对比吗啡用于创伤性疼痛患者院外镇痛的随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352844. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52844.