• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外椎间盘后移和游离:系统综述。

Posterior epidural intervertebral disc migration and sequestration: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.

Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Apr;98:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.01.039. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2022.01.039
PMID:35152147
Abstract

Posterior epidural intervertebral disc migration and sequestration (PEIMS) is a rare and debilitating complication of degenerative disc disease. Radiological differential diagnosis is often challenging, complicating the accurate planning of appropriate treatment strategies. We systematically reviewed the literature on PEIMS, focusing on clinical-radiological features and available treatments. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched to include studies reporting clinical data of patients with PEIMS. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and functional outcomes were analyzed. We included 82 studies comprising 157 patients. Median age was 54 years (range, 19-91). PEIMSs occurred spontaneously (49.7%) or acutely in patients with underlying progressive degenerative disc disease (50.3%). The most common symptoms were lower-back pain (77.1%) and radiculopathy (66.2%), mainly involving the L5 nerve root (43.8%). PEIMSs were mostly detected at MRI (93%) and/or CT (7%), frequently located in the lumbar spine (81.5%). Median maximum PEIMS diameter was 2.4 cm (range, 1.2-5.0). Surgical debulking was completed in 150 patients (95.5%), sometimes coupled with decompressive laminectomy (65%) or hemilaminectomy (19.1%). Median follow-up time was 3 months (range, 0.5-36.0). Post-treatment symptomatic improvement was reported in 153 patients (97.5%), with total recovery in 118 (75.2%). All 7 patients (4.5%) who received conservative non-surgical management had total clinical recovery at ≤ 3 months follow-ups. PEIMS is a challenging entity that may severely quality-of-life in patients with degenerative disc disease. Surgical removal represents the gold standard to improve patient's functional status. Spine fusion and conservative strategies proved to be effective in some cases.

摘要

椎间盘后硬膜外迁移和隔离症(PEIMS)是一种罕见的退行性椎间盘疾病的致残性并发症。放射学的鉴别诊断通常具有挑战性,这使得准确规划适当的治疗策略变得复杂。我们系统地回顾了关于 PEIMS 的文献,重点关注临床放射学特征和可用的治疗方法。我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 中进行了搜索,以纳入报道了患有 PEIMS 的患者临床数据的研究。分析了临床特征、治疗策略和功能结果。我们纳入了 82 项研究,共 157 例患者。中位年龄为 54 岁(范围 19-91 岁)。PEIMS 自发发生(49.7%)或在患有潜在进行性退行性椎间盘疾病的患者中急性发生(50.3%)。最常见的症状是下腰痛(77.1%)和神经根病(66.2%),主要涉及 L5 神经根(43.8%)。PEIMS 主要在 MRI(93%)和/或 CT(7%)上检测到,通常位于腰椎(81.5%)。最大的 PEIMS 直径中位数为 2.4 厘米(范围 1.2-5.0)。150 例患者(95.5%)完成了手术去块,有时结合减压性椎板切除术(65%)或半椎板切除术(19.1%)。中位随访时间为 3 个月(范围 0.5-36.0)。153 例患者(97.5%)报告了治疗后的症状改善,118 例患者(75.2%)完全恢复。所有 7 例(4.5%)接受非手术保守治疗的患者在随访≤3 个月时均完全恢复临床症状。PEIMS 是一种具有挑战性的疾病实体,可能会严重影响退行性椎间盘疾病患者的生活质量。手术切除是改善患者功能状态的金标准。脊柱融合和保守策略在某些情况下已被证明是有效的。

相似文献

1
Posterior epidural intervertebral disc migration and sequestration: A systematic review.硬膜外椎间盘后移和游离:系统综述。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Apr;98:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.01.039. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Effects of posterior lumbar nonfusion surgery with isobar devices versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery on clinical and radiological features in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis.后路非融合术联合等压装置与后路腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床和影像学特征的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 21;17(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03015-6.
3
Is discectomy effective for treating low back pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and Modic changes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.椎间盘切除术对伴有腰椎间盘突出症和Modic改变的患者治疗下腰痛是否有效?一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):533-549. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Risk factors for progression of nucleus pulposus degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc: a retrospective analysis using the disc signal intensity index.腰椎间盘髓核退变进展的危险因素:一项使用椎间盘信号强度指数的回顾性分析
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1466-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.036. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
5
Lumbar disc arthroplasty.腰椎间盘置换术。
Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.006.
6
Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.退行性腰椎病的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001352.pub3.
7
Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术与非手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Feb;32(2):146-160. doi: 10.1177/0269215517719952. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.退行性腰椎病的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD001352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001352.pub2.
9
Algorithm-based pain management for people with dementia in nursing homes.基于算法的养老院痴呆患者疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD013339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013339.pub2.
10
Cervical intradural disc herniation: A systematic review.颈椎硬膜内椎间盘突出症:一项系统综述。
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Feb;48:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulating macrophage phenotypes with IL4I1-mimetic nanoparticles in IDD treatment.在椎间盘退变治疗中用白细胞介素4诱导基因1模拟纳米颗粒调节巨噬细胞表型。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 Mar 6;23(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03241-0.
2
Posterior epidural migration of thoracic and lumbar disc material: a comprehensive 63-year systematic review with anatomical perspectives.胸腰椎间盘物质的硬膜外后移:一项从解剖学角度进行的63年全面系统综述
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 16;48(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03201-0.
3
Efficiency of Lidocaine Intramuscular and Intraosseous Trigger Point Injections in the Treatment of Residual Chronic Pain after Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompression Surgery.
利多卡因肌内注射和骨内触发点注射治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄减压术后残留慢性疼痛的疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5437. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185437.
4
Management of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A retrospective analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.腰椎滑脱的治疗:后路腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的回顾性分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Jan-Mar;15(1):99-104. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_74_23. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Advancing insights into recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A comparative analysis of surgical approaches and a new classification.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的研究进展:手术方法的比较分析及一种新分类法
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Jan-Mar;15(1):66-73. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_177_23. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
Management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and repeat discectomy.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:后路腰椎椎间融合术与再次椎间盘切除术的对比分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jan 3;86(2):842-849. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001600. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for pathologies of lumbar spine: A nationwide cross-sectional study from a lower-middle-income country.腰椎疾病的内镜下与显微镜下椎间盘切除术:来自一个中低收入国家的全国性横断面研究。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):373-380. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_39_23. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
8
The post spinal surgery syndrome: A review.脊柱手术后综合征:综述
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Jan-Mar;14(1):4-10. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_118_22. Epub 2023 Mar 13.