Suppr超能文献

探索与痴呆症患者成功的非药物干预相关的因素。

Exploring Factors Associated With Successful Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With Dementia.

作者信息

Park HyounKyoung Grace, Perumean-Chaney Suzanne E, Bartolucci Alfred A

机构信息

Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2022 Jan;21(1):1-16. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2022.21.1.1. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We investigated existing nonpharmacological programs for people with dementia (PWD) to explore critical factors related to the effectiveness of these types of programs.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative systematic literature review to identify nonpharmacological intervention programs developed for PWD and reviewed 36 randomized controlled trials. Among several outcomes reported in each study, we focused on the most common outcomes including quality of life (QoL), neuropsychiatric symptoms, depression, agitation, and cognition for further review.

RESULTS

Several factors were identified that might affect the outcomes of nonpharmacological interventions for PWD including study design, characteristics of the intervention, maintaining research participants, heterogeneity issues, and implementation fidelity. About half of studies in this review reported positive program effects on their targeted outcomes such as Well-being and Health for PWD on improving quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms and agitation; cognitive stimulation therapy on QoL, neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognition; and a stepwise multicomponent intervention on neuropsychiatric symptoms, depression and agitation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found some programs even with a rigorous study design did not produce expected outcomes while other programs with poor designs reported positive outcomes, which necessitates further investigation on the validity of the assessments. Factors such as individual tailored and customized interventions, promoting social interactions, ease of administration and compatibility of interventions, and developing program theory need to be considered when developing nonpharmacological intervention programs.

摘要

背景与目的

我们调查了现有的针对痴呆症患者(PWD)的非药物项目,以探索与这类项目有效性相关的关键因素。

方法

我们进行了一项定性系统文献综述,以确定为痴呆症患者制定的非药物干预项目,并回顾了36项随机对照试验。在每项研究报告的多个结果中,我们重点关注最常见的结果,包括生活质量(QoL)、神经精神症状、抑郁、激越和认知,以供进一步审查。

结果

确定了几个可能影响痴呆症患者非药物干预结果的因素,包括研究设计、干预特征、维持研究参与者、异质性问题和实施保真度。本综述中约一半的研究报告了项目对其目标结果的积极影响,如改善痴呆症患者生活质量、神经精神症状和激越的“幸福与健康”项目;认知刺激疗法对生活质量、神经精神症状和认知的影响;以及对神经精神症状、抑郁和激越的逐步多成分干预。

结论

我们发现一些设计严谨的项目并未产生预期结果,而其他设计不佳的项目却报告了积极结果,这就需要进一步调查评估的有效性。在制定非药物干预项目时,需要考虑个体定制和量身定制的干预措施、促进社交互动、易于实施和干预措施的兼容性以及发展项目理论等因素。

相似文献

3
4
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10

本文引用的文献

7
Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia.针对轻度至中度痴呆症患者的认知训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 25;3(3):CD013069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013069.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验