Hallit Rachel, Calmels Mélanie, Chaput Ulriikka, Lorenzo Diane, Becq Aymeric, Camus Marine, Dray Xavier, Gonzalez Jean Michel, Barthet Marc, Jacques Jérémie, Barrioz Thierry, Legros Romain, Belle Arthur, Chaussade Stanislas, Coriat Romain, Cattan Pierre, Prat Frédéric, Goere Diane, Barret Maximilien
Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and University of Paris, 27, rue du Faubourg St Jacques, Paris, 75014, France.
Digestive Surgery Department, St Louis University Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and University of Paris, Paris, France.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 23;14:17562848211032823. doi: 10.1177/17562848211032823. eCollection 2021.
Most anastomotic leaks after surgical resection for esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies are treated endoscopically with esophageal stents. Internal drainage by double pigtail stents has been used for the endoscopic management of leaks following bariatric surgery, and recently introduced for anastomotic leaks after resections for malignancies. Our aim was to assess the overall efficacy of the endoscopic treatment for anastomotic leaks after esophageal or gastric resection for malignancies.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in four digestive endoscopy tertiary referral centers in France. We included consecutive patients managed endoscopically for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy or gastrectomy for malignancies between January 2016 and December 2018. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the endoscopic management on leak closure.
Sixty-eight patients were included, among which 46 men and 22 women, with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 11 years. Forty-four percent had an Ivor Lewis procedure, 16% a tri-incisional esophagectomy, and 40% a total gastrectomy. The median time between surgery and the diagnosis of leak was 9 (6-13) days. Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90% of the patients. The efficacy of internal drainage and esophageal stents was 95% and 77%, respectively ( = 0.06). The mortality rate was 3%. The only predictive factor of successful endoscopic treatment was the initial use of internal drainage ( = 0.002).
Endoscopic management of early postoperative leak is successful in 90% of patients, preventing highly morbid surgical revisions. Internal endoscopic drainage should be considered as the first-line endoscopic treatment of anastomotic fistulas whenever technically feasible.
大多数食管或食管胃交界部恶性肿瘤手术切除后的吻合口漏采用食管支架进行内镜治疗。双猪尾支架内引流已用于肥胖症手术后吻合口漏的内镜处理,最近也被用于恶性肿瘤切除术后的吻合口漏。我们的目的是评估内镜治疗食管或胃恶性肿瘤切除术后吻合口漏的总体疗效。
我们在法国的四个消化内镜三级转诊中心进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。我们纳入了2016年1月至2018年12月期间因恶性肿瘤行食管切除术或胃切除术后经内镜处理吻合口漏的连续患者。主要结局是内镜处理对漏口闭合的疗效。
纳入68例患者,其中男性46例,女性22例,平均年龄±标准差为61±11岁。44%的患者接受了艾弗·刘易斯手术,16%的患者接受了三切口食管切除术,40%的患者接受了全胃切除术。手术与漏口诊断之间的中位时间为9(6 - 13)天。90%的患者内镜治疗成功。内引流和食管支架的疗效分别为95%和77%(P = 0.06)。死亡率为3%。内镜治疗成功的唯一预测因素是最初使用内引流(P = 0.002)。
术后早期漏口的内镜处理在90%的患者中成功,避免了高风险的手术翻修。只要技术可行,内镜内引流应被视为吻合口瘘的一线内镜治疗方法。