Jagadeesh Nuthan, Kumar Hiranya, Sarparaju Varma, Shivalingappa Vishwanath
Trauma and Orthopedics, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Jan 9;14(1):e21039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21039. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Background An accelerometer-based handheld navigation system (HHNS) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not require a large console needed for computer-assisted navigation systems and has been shown to decrease component malalignment in TKA. The study aimed to use HHNS with conventional instrumentation to compare the radiological evaluation and functional outcomes of TKA. Materials and methods This was a multi-surgeon, prospective, assessor-blinded comparative study of 122 patients undergoing unilateral TKA. We used a stratified randomized sampling method to select 35/48 patients undergoing TKA using a handheld navigation system and 35/74 patients undergoing TKA using conventional instrumentation and divided them into two groups: the HHNS group and (conventional) CONV group. Postoperative radiographic evaluation was based on the tibial and femoral alignment angle, posterior tibial slope, and tibiofemoral angle measured from full-length lower-limb anteroposterior and lateral views of the knee. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Score (KSS) with a two-year serial follow-up were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Results The mean tibial alignment angle and posterior tibial slope were 0.78° ± 1.27° and 4.38° ± 0.86°, respectively, in the HHNS cohort and 2.63° ± 1.54° and 2.12° ± 1.82°, respectively, in the CONV group ( < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the femoral alignment angles. The overall alignment using the mean tibiofemoral angle was 179.21° ± 1.82° in the HHNS group and 177.31° ± 2.18° in the CONV group ( = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the KSS and OKS at the two-year follow-up between the groups. Conclusions The use of HHNS in TKA significantly increased accuracy in limb and implant alignment, but there was no significant difference in the two-years functional outcomes.
用于全膝关节置换术(TKA)的基于加速度计的手持式导航系统(HHNS)不需要计算机辅助导航系统所需的大型控制台,并且已被证明可减少TKA中组件的排列不齐。本研究旨在将HHNS与传统器械结合使用,以比较TKA的放射学评估和功能结果。
这是一项多外科医生、前瞻性、评估者盲法的比较研究,纳入了122例行单侧TKA的患者。我们采用分层随机抽样方法,选择35/48例使用手持式导航系统进行TKA的患者和35/74例使用传统器械进行TKA的患者,并将他们分为两组:HHNS组和(传统)CONV组。术后放射学评估基于从膝关节全长下肢前后位和侧位片测量的胫骨和股骨对线角度、胫骨后倾坡度和胫股角度。使用牛津膝关节评分(OKS)和膝关节协会评分(KSS)进行为期两年的连续随访,以评估功能结果。
HHNS队列中胫骨平均对线角度和胫骨后倾坡度分别为0.78°±1.27°和4.38°±0.86°,CONV组分别为2.63°±1.54°和2.12°±1.82°(<0.001)。股骨对线角度无显著差异。HHNS组使用平均胫股角度的整体对线为179.21°±1.82°,CONV组为177.31°±2.18°(=0.002)。两组在两年随访时的KSS和OKS无显著差异。
在TKA中使用HHNS可显著提高肢体和植入物对线的准确性,但两年功能结果无显著差异。