Boutillier Johanna, Cardona Venetia, Magnan Pascal, Ogier Michael, De Mezzo Sébastien, Montespan Florent, Menini William, Mosnier Joël, Naz Pierre, Prat Nicolas J
French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis (ISL), Saint-Louis, France.
French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, France.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Jan 27;9:786881. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.786881. eCollection 2021.
Exposure to blast is one of the major causes of death and disability in recent military conflicts. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the protective capability of the ballistic-proof equipment worn by soldiers against the effects of blast overpressure (i.e., primary blast injuries). A focus will be made on thoracic protective equipment (TPE). An anthropomorphic mannequin, called BOPMAN, and anesthetized swine both wearing soft, hard or no ballistic protection, were subjected to an open-field high-intensity blast. For swine, thoracic wall motion (acceleration and velocity) was recorded during blast exposure and severity of lung injury was evaluated postmortem. Different data were collected from BOPMAN thoracic responses, including reflected and internal pressure, as well as the force at the rear face of the instrumented part. The severity of blast-induced lung injuries (contusion extent, Axelsson Severity Scale) and the thoracic wall motion were decreased in animals protected with thoracic ceramic hard plates as compared to those wearing soft or no protection. There was a clear trend towards greater lung injury in animals protected with the soft body armor used, even when compared to unprotected animals. In line with these experimental data, the measured force as well as the force impulse measured using BOPMAN were also decreased with a ceramic hard plate protection and increased when a soft ballistic pack was used compared to no protection. Comparison of data collected on BOPMAN and swine equipped with the same protection level revealed that those two force parameters were well correlated with the level of blast-induced lung injury (force, R = 0.74 and force impulse, R = 0.77, < 0.05). Taken together, our results suggest that the force and the force impulse data from BOPMAN may help estimate the efficiency of existing TPE regarding lung protection under blast exposure and may represent an important tool for development of future TPE.
在近期的军事冲突中,暴露于爆炸是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因之一。因此,评估士兵所穿防弹装备对爆炸超压影响(即原发性爆炸伤)的防护能力至关重要。本文将重点关注胸部防护装备(TPE)。使用一个名为BOPMAN的人体模型和麻醉后的猪,它们分别穿着软质、硬质防弹装备或不穿防弹装备,在开阔场地接受高强度爆炸。对于猪,在爆炸暴露期间记录胸壁运动(加速度和速度),并在死后评估肺损伤的严重程度。从BOPMAN的胸部反应中收集了不同的数据,包括反射压力和内部压力,以及仪器化部分背面的力。与穿着软质防弹装备或不穿防弹装备的动物相比,使用胸部陶瓷硬板保护的动物爆炸所致肺损伤的严重程度(挫伤范围、阿克塞尔松严重程度量表)和胸壁运动有所降低。即使与未受保护的动物相比,使用所研究的软质防弹衣保护的动物也有更严重肺损伤的明显趋势。与这些实验数据一致,使用BOPMAN测量的力以及力冲量在使用陶瓷硬板保护时也降低了,与无保护相比,使用软质防弹包时则增加了。对配备相同防护水平的BOPMAN和猪所收集数据的比较表明,这两个力参数与爆炸所致肺损伤水平密切相关(力,R = 0.74;力冲量,R = 0.77,P < 0.05)。综上所述,我们的结果表明,来自BOPMAN的力和力冲量数据可能有助于评估现有TPE在爆炸暴露下对肺部的保护效率,并且可能是未来TPE开发的重要工具。