• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对医疗质量的认知:外科病房的团队合作干预研究

Patients' Perceptions of Quality of Care: A Teamwork Intervention Study in a Surgical Ward.

作者信息

Hall-Lord Marie Louise, Ballangrud Randi

机构信息

Department of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.

出版信息

SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Feb 8;8:23779608221076814. doi: 10.1177/23779608221076814. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/23779608221076814
PMID:35155776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8829721/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Improving teamwork competencies among health care professionals is important for patient safety. Few previous studies have investigated whether a teamwork intervention has an impact on patients' perceptions of quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patients' perceptions of quality of care before and after the implementation of a team training program in a surgical ward.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental pre- and posttest design was used. The TeamSTEPPS team training program was implemented in a surgical ward. Three groups of consecutively sampled patients responded to the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) questionnaire including four dimensions with 25 items. In addition to the QPP, six items were developed for this study. In total, 223 patients responded to the questionnaire. The mean age was 59.6 years, and there were 128 males and 94 females.

RESULTS

The physical-technical condition dimension and four items showed significantly higher scores after six months of intervention. The majority of the patients scored quality of care in the four dimensions as very high at all three time points. Younger patients reported the lowest care quality.

CONCLUSION

The results in this study indicate that the teamwork intervention had a minimal impact on the patients' perceptions of quality of care, with only significant differences between baseline and six months of intervention in one dimension and three items. At each data collection time point, the numbers of patients who perceived quality of care as modest decreased slightly. Younger patients were more likely to perceive care quality as modest.

摘要

引言

提高医疗保健专业人员的团队合作能力对患者安全至关重要。此前很少有研究调查团队合作干预是否会影响患者对医疗质量的看法。

目的

调查在外科病房实施团队培训计划前后患者对医疗质量的看法。

方法

采用准实验性前后测设计。在一个外科病房实施了团队策略与工具(TeamSTEPPS)团队培训计划。三组连续抽样的患者对患者视角质量(QPP)问卷做出回应,该问卷包括四个维度共25个项目。除了QPP问卷外,本研究还编制了6个项目。共有223名患者对问卷做出回应。患者平均年龄为59.6岁,其中男性128名,女性94名。

结果

在干预6个月后,物理技术状况维度及4个项目的得分显著更高。在所有三个时间点,大多数患者对四个维度的医疗质量评分都非常高。年轻患者报告的护理质量最低。

结论

本研究结果表明,团队合作干预对患者对医疗质量的看法影响甚微,仅在一个维度和三个项目上基线与干预6个月之间存在显著差异。在每个数据收集时间点,认为医疗质量一般的患者数量略有下降。年轻患者更有可能认为护理质量一般。

相似文献

1
Patients' Perceptions of Quality of Care: A Teamwork Intervention Study in a Surgical Ward.患者对医疗质量的认知:外科病房的团队合作干预研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Feb 8;8:23779608221076814. doi: 10.1177/23779608221076814. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
An interprofessional team training intervention with an implementation phase in a surgical ward: A controlled quasi-experimental study.一项在外科病房进行的具有实施阶段的跨专业团队培训干预措施:一项对照准实验研究。
J Interprof Care. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1697216. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
A human factors intervention in a hospital - evaluating the outcome of a TeamSTEPPS program in a surgical ward.医院中的人为因素干预——评估外科病房团队策略与拓展项目的效果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 3;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06071-6.
4
Bachelor of nursing students' attitudes toward teamwork in healthcare: The impact of implementing a teamSTEPPS® team training program - A longitudinal, quasi-experimental study.护理专业学生对医疗保健团队合作的态度:实施团队训练计划(TeamSTEPPS®)的影响——一项纵向、准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105180. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105180. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
"Teamwork in hospitals": a quasi-experimental study protocol applying a human factors approach.“医院中的团队合作”:一项应用人为因素方法的准实验研究方案
BMC Nurs. 2017 Jun 29;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0229-z. eCollection 2017.
6
Patients' perceptions of palliative care quality in hospice inpatient care, hospice day care, palliative units in nursing homes, and home care: a cross-sectional study.临终关怀住院护理、临终关怀日间护理、养老院姑息治疗病房及家庭护理中患者对姑息治疗质量的认知:一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 24;15(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0152-1.
7
Development of a Short Form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC).患者视角下姑息治疗问卷质量简表(QPP-PC)的编制
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Jun 12;13:495-506. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S246184. eCollection 2020.
8
Longitudinal team training programme in a Norwegian surgical ward: a qualitative study of nurses' and physicians' experiences with teamwork skills.挪威外科病房纵向团队培训计划:护士和医生对团队合作技能的经验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):e035432. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035432.
9
Patients' perceptions of palliative care: adaptation of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective instrument for use in palliative care, and description of patients' perceptions of care received.患者对姑息治疗的看法:从患者角度改编用于姑息治疗的质量评估工具,并描述患者对所接受护理的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 2;14:54. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0049-4.
10
Health care quality from the patients' perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital.从患者角度看医疗质量:一家老医院与一家新建高科技医院的对比研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Oct 18;11:591-600. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S176630. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors of art-mediated educational strategies on life attitudes of teaching hospital staff: a quantitative study.艺术介导的教育策略对教学医院工作人员生活态度的影响因素:一项定量研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 27;25(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07333-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A human factors intervention in a hospital - evaluating the outcome of a TeamSTEPPS program in a surgical ward.医院中的人为因素干预——评估外科病房团队策略与拓展项目的效果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 3;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06071-6.
2
Longitudinal team training programme in a Norwegian surgical ward: a qualitative study of nurses' and physicians' experiences with teamwork skills.挪威外科病房纵向团队培训计划:护士和医生对团队合作技能的经验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 8;10(7):e035432. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035432.
3
Patient involvement in surgical care-Healthcare personnel views and behaviour regarding patient involvement.患者参与手术护理——医护人员对患者参与的看法及行为
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):96-103. doi: 10.1111/scs.12823. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
4
Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.改善医疗保健领域团队效能的干预措施:过去十年的系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Jan 8;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3.
5
An interprofessional team training intervention with an implementation phase in a surgical ward: A controlled quasi-experimental study.一项在外科病房进行的具有实施阶段的跨专业团队培训干预措施:一项对照准实验研究。
J Interprof Care. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1697216. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
A complex teamwork intervention in a surgical ward in Norway.挪威一家外科病房的复杂团队协作干预措施。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Sep 14;12(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4619-z.
7
Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions in Team questionnaire-Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version, and hospital healthcare personnel perceptions across hospital units.团队护理决策协作与满意度问卷——挪威语版本的心理测量测试以及医院各科室医护人员的看法
Nurs Open. 2019 Feb 20;6(2):642-650. doi: 10.1002/nop2.251. eCollection 2019 Apr.
8
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.医疗保健中的团队合作:实现更安全、高质量护理的关键发现。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000298.
9
Interprofessional education involving didactic TeamSTEPPS® and interactive healthcare simulation: A systematic review.涉及讲授式团队策略与增强患者安全(TeamSTEPPS®)及交互式医疗模拟的跨专业教育:一项系统综述。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Nov;32(6):657-665. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1472069. Epub 2018 May 14.
10
"Teamwork in hospitals": a quasi-experimental study protocol applying a human factors approach.“医院中的团队合作”:一项应用人为因素方法的准实验研究方案
BMC Nurs. 2017 Jun 29;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0229-z. eCollection 2017.