基于靶向 DNA 甲基化分析的白细胞计数的临床应用。

Toward Clinical Application of Leukocyte Counts Based on Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Engineering-Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Stem Cell Biology and Cellular Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2022 May 18;68(5):646-656. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differential leukocyte counts are usually measured based on cellular morphology or surface marker expression. It has recently been shown that leukocyte counts can also be determined by cell-type-specific DNA methylation (DNAm). Such epigenetic leukocyte counting is applicable to small blood volumes and even frozen material, but for clinical translation, the method needs to be further refined and validated.

METHODS

We further optimized and validated targeted DNAm assays for leukocyte deconvolution using 332 venous and 122 capillary blood samples from healthy donors. In addition, we tested 36 samples from ring trials and venous blood from 266 patients diagnosed with different hematological diseases. Deconvolution of cell types was determined with various models using DNAm values obtained by pyrosequencing or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR).

RESULTS

Relative leukocyte quantification correlated with conventional blood counts for granulocytes, lymphocytes, B cells, T cells (CD4 or CD8), natural killer cells, and monocytes with pyrosequencing (r = 0.84; r = 0.82; r = 0.58; r = 0.50; r = 0.70; r = 0.61; and r = 0.59, respectively) and ddPCR measurements (r = 0.65; r = 0.79; r = 0.56; r = 0.57; r = 0.75; r = 0.49; and r = 0.46, respectively). In some patients, particularly with hematopoietic malignancies, we observed outliers in epigenetic leukocyte counts, which could be discerned if relative proportions of leukocyte subsets did not sum up to 100%. Furthermore, absolute quantification was obtained by spiking blood samples with a reference plasmid of known copy number.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted DNAm analysis by pyrosequencing or ddPCR is a valid alternative to quantify leukocyte subsets, but some assays require further optimization.

摘要

背景

白细胞计数通常基于细胞形态或表面标志物表达来测量。最近表明,白细胞计数也可以通过细胞类型特异性 DNA 甲基化(DNAm)来确定。这种表观遗传白细胞计数适用于小体积血液,甚至是冷冻材料,但为了临床转化,该方法需要进一步优化和验证。

方法

我们使用 332 份来自健康供体的静脉血和 122 份毛细管血样本,进一步优化和验证了针对白细胞去卷积的靶向 DNAm 分析。此外,我们还测试了 36 个来自环试验的样本和 266 名诊断为不同血液疾病的患者的静脉血。使用焦磷酸测序或数字液滴 PCR(ddPCR)获得的 DNAm 值,通过各种模型确定细胞类型的去卷积。

结果

相对白细胞定量与使用焦磷酸测序(r = 0.84;r = 0.82;r = 0.58;r = 0.50;r = 0.70;r = 0.61;r = 0.59)和 ddPCR 测量(r = 0.65;r = 0.79;r = 0.56;r = 0.57;r = 0.75;r = 0.49;r = 0.46)的粒细胞、淋巴细胞、B 细胞、T 细胞(CD4 或 CD8)、自然杀伤细胞和单核细胞的常规血液计数相关。在一些患者中,特别是在造血恶性肿瘤患者中,我们观察到表观遗传白细胞计数的异常值,如果白细胞亚群的相对比例加起来不为 100%,则可以辨别出来。此外,通过用已知拷贝数的参考质粒对血样进行加标,可以获得绝对定量。

结论

焦磷酸测序或 ddPCR 的靶向 DNAm 分析是一种有效的替代方法,可以定量白细胞亚群,但某些检测需要进一步优化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索