Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Can J Cardiol. 2022 May;38(5):623-633. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
Systemic vasculitis can be a challenge to differentiate from other forms of vasculopathy. Because treatment for systemic vasculitis is disparate from that for other forms of vasculopathy, clinicians should strive for high diagnostic certainty. This review article aims to highlight the clinical, radiographic, and histologic clues to distinguish systemic vasculitis from mimics. Vasculitis should be considered in patients with preexisting conditions including autoimmune connective tissue diseases, multisystem manifestations, unexplained ischemic events, unusual radiographic findings, or signs of systemic inflammation. A multidisciplinary approach can be used among rheumatologists, vascular cardiologists, radiologists, and vascular interventionalists to raise diagnostic certainty in cases with large- and/or medium-vessel involvement. Recognition of cardiac manifestations, including myocarditis seen in forms of small-vessel vasculitis (eg, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis) or coronary arteritis seen in forms of medium-vessel vasculitis (eg, polyarteritis nodosa and Kawasaki disease) is important owing to the associated mortality. Clinical phenotype, radiographic features, laboratory tests, and histology can help to differentiate vasculitis from noninflammatory vasculopathies and define the etiology of the vasculitis to help guide appropriate treatment. Various modalities of imaging can give clues to aid in diagnosis of vasculitis and can be considered in the context of physician preference and patient comorbidity. While conventional angiography can give important details regarding luminal anatomy and pressure gradients in medium- and large-vessel vasculitis, noninvasive imaging modalities such as computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, color Doppler ultrasound, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography are commonly used for both diagnosis and follow-up. Treatment for systemic vasculitis should be coordinated with an experienced rheumatologist.
系统性血管炎的鉴别诊断颇具挑战,因其需要与其他形式的血管病变相区分。由于系统性血管炎的治疗方法与其他形式的血管病变不同,因此临床医生应努力提高诊断的确定性。本文旨在强调临床、影像学和组织学线索,以区分系统性血管炎和其类似疾病。当患者存在自身免疫性结缔组织病、多系统表现、原因不明的缺血性事件、不典型影像学发现或全身炎症迹象等预先存在的疾病时,应考虑血管炎的可能性。对于大血管和/或中血管受累的病例,可以采用风湿科医生、血管心脏病专家、放射科医生和血管介入专家的多学科方法来提高诊断的确定性。识别心脏表现很重要,包括小血管血管炎(如嗜酸性肉芽肿伴多血管炎)中的心肌炎或中血管血管炎(如多发性动脉炎和川崎病)中的冠状动脉炎,因为这会导致相关的死亡率。临床表型、影像学特征、实验室检查和组织学有助于将血管炎与非炎症性血管病变区分开来,并确定血管炎的病因,以帮助指导适当的治疗。各种成像方式可以提供有助于诊断血管炎的线索,并可以根据医生的偏好和患者的合并症进行考虑。虽然传统血管造影可以提供关于中大和大血管血管炎管腔解剖结构和压力梯度的重要细节,但非侵入性成像方式,如计算机断层血管造影、磁共振血管造影、彩色多普勒超声和正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描,常用于诊断和随访。系统性血管炎的治疗应与经验丰富的风湿病专家协调进行。