Surgery Department, Montreal University, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boulevard de l'Assomption, H1T 2M4 Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Surgery Department, Montreal University, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boulevard de l'Assomption, H1T 2M4 Montréal, Québec, Canada; Clinique Orthopédique Duval, 1487, boulevard des Laurentides, H7M 2Y3 Laval, Québec, Canada.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Feb;109(1):103242. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103242. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
Complex anatomy of the proximal femur makes total hip arthroplasty (THA) more challenging. Short, straight, fluted and conical titanium stem like the Wagner Cone can be helpful to address small femoral canal, increased femoral neck version, important leg length discrepancy or proximal femoral deformity. The outcome in these patients is less assured and associated with high rate of complications. Therefore, we did a retrospective study aiming to answer: 1) can the Wagner Cone stem provide acceptable mid- to long-term implant survivorship; 2) help minimizing perioperative adverse events; 3) produce favorable clinical outcome measured by WOMAC score; and 4) be associated with a favorable radiographic femoral bone remodeling at the last follow-up?
Wagner Cone stem is an advantageous solution for the distorted proximal femur in complex THA.
Our cohort was derived from the patient registries where medical records of 88 patients (103 hips) who underwent primary THA using the Wagner prosthesis were retrospectively reviewed. Then, data was analyzed for patients' demographics and surgical data, and comparing preoperative, immediate postoperative and last follow-up data. Eleven patients (12 hips) were excluded (7 hips followed up less than 2 years or lost to follow-up, 3 hips that had the Wagner stem for revision and 2 Wagner stems inserted for periprosthetic fracture). This left 77 patients (91 hips) with Wagner cone stems implanted for more than 2 years between March 2003 and February 2017 by 7 surgeons in 3 academic hospitals. Implant revision, reoperations, WOMAC score and radiographic analyses were recorded at last follow-up.
After a mean follow-up of 7.8 (range, 2.0-16.2) years, Wagner stem survivorship was 98.9% (95% CI: 94 to 100%) with one (1.1%) stem revision for failure of osteointegration. Five (5.5%) acetabular revisions, one for aseptic loosening, 2 for adverse reaction to metal debris and 2 for infection. One (1.1%) sciatic neuropathy and 4 (4.4%) intraoperative fractures were encountered. The mean WOMAC score was 90.5±11.4 (59-100). Radiographic analysis showed clear signs of stem osseointegration and hypertrophic bone remodeling in 82 cases (92.1%).
Used in complex cases with proximal distorted femurs, the Wagner Cone stem demonstrated a low complication rate, a high-rate consistent adaptive bone remodeling, excellent clinical results, and midterm survival. It is a safe, reliable and advantageous option in complex primary THA. However, the contribution of the underlying cause of the secondary osteoarthritis on the long-term survival of the stem remains to be demonstrated.
IV; retrospective study.
股骨近端的复杂解剖结构使全髋关节置换术(THA)更具挑战性。短、直、有凹槽和锥形的钛制股骨柄,如 Wagner 锥形柄,有助于解决小股骨髓腔、股骨颈增大、明显的肢体长度差异或股骨近端畸形等问题。这些患者的治疗效果不太确定,并且与高并发症发生率相关。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,旨在回答以下问题:1)Wagner 锥形柄能否提供可接受的中期至长期植入物存活率;2)有助于最小化围手术期不良事件;3)通过 WOMAC 评分得出良好的临床结果;4)在末次随访时与有利的影像学股骨骨重塑相关?
Wagner 锥形柄是复杂 THA 中股骨近端畸形的有利解决方案。
我们的队列来自患者注册处,回顾性分析了 2003 年 3 月至 2017 年 2 月期间,由 7 名外科医生在 3 家学术医院为 88 名患者(103 髋)进行初次 THA 时使用 Wagner 假体的患者的病历。然后,分析患者的人口统计学和手术数据,并比较术前、术后即刻和末次随访时的数据。11 名患者(12 髋)被排除(7 髋随访时间少于 2 年或失访,3 髋因 Wagner 柄翻修,2 髋因假体周围骨折而置入 Wagner 柄)。这使得 77 名患者(91 髋)在末次随访时使用 Wagner 锥形柄超过 2 年,其中 7 名患者由 7 名外科医生进行。记录植入物翻修、再次手术、WOMAC 评分和影像学分析。
平均随访 7.8 年(范围,2.0-16.2 年)后,Wagner 柄的存活率为 98.9%(95%CI:94-100%),1 例(1.1%)因骨整合失败而进行柄翻修。5 例(5.5%)髋臼翻修,1 例因无菌性松动,2 例因金属碎屑不良反应,2 例因感染。发生 1 例(1.1%)坐骨神经神经病和 4 例(4.4%)术中骨折。WOMAC 评分平均为 90.5±11.4(59-100)。影像学分析显示 82 例(92.1%)有明确的柄骨整合和肥大性骨重塑迹象。
在近端股骨畸形的复杂病例中使用 Wagner 锥形柄,并发症发生率低,一致的适应性骨重塑率高,临床效果好,中期生存率高。它是复杂初次 THA 的一种安全、可靠和有利的选择。然而,继发骨关节炎的根本原因对柄的长期存活率的影响仍有待证明。
IV;回顾性研究。