Castagnini Francesco, Bordini Barbara, Cosentino Monica, Gorgone Mara, Minerba Andrea, Rotini Marco, Diquattro Emanuele, Traina Francesco
SC Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti di Anca e Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, via di Barbiano 1/13, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 6;13(19):5943. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195943.
: Single-taper conical tapered stems (STCTSs) are possible options for femoral reconstruction in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis, but outcomes are poorly ascertained. A specific STCTS in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis was investigated and compared to a control group including all the other cementless stems, aiming to assess the following: (1) the survival rates of the two cohorts and the hazard ratios for failure; (2) the survival rates and the hazard ratios for failures for stem failure, stem aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture. : A regional arthroplasty registry study evaluating a specific STCTS in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis was designed. A control group including all the other cementless stems was considered. : In total, 1773 STCTSs were compared to 37,944 cementless stems. The cumulative survivorship of the STCTS cohort was 95.6% at 10 years and 92.7% at 15 years, which was not different to the control group ( = 0.252). After age stratification, the hazard ratio for STCTS failure was not different to the control group. With stem revision as the endpoint, the STCTS cohort outperformed the control group (at 10 years, 98% versus 96.8%; < 0.001). The STCTSs achieved better survival rates in females <65 years ( = 0.023). With stem aseptic loosening as the endpoint, the survival rates did not differ between the two cohorts ( = 0.085), as well as the adjusted hazard ratios ( = 0.264). With periprosthetic fracture as the endpoint, the survival rates were better for the STCTSs ( < 0.001). : STCTSs in THA for primary osteoarthritis provided dependable long-term outcomes, not inferior to all the other cementless stems with various designs.
单锥度锥形柄(STCTS)是在初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中用于股骨重建的一种可行选择,该手术用于治疗原发性骨关节炎,但相关结果尚不清楚。本研究对用于原发性骨关节炎的THA中的一种特定STCTS进行了调查,并与包括所有其他非骨水泥柄的对照组进行比较,旨在评估以下内容:(1)两个队列的生存率以及失败的风险比;(2)柄失败、柄无菌性松动和假体周围骨折的生存率及失败风险比。:设计了一项区域关节置换登记研究,评估用于原发性骨关节炎的THA中的一种特定STCTS。考虑了一个包括所有其他非骨水泥柄的对照组。:总共将1773个STCTS与37944个非骨水泥柄进行了比较。STCTS队列在10年时的累积生存率为95.6%,在15年时为92.7%,与对照组无差异(P = 0.252)。年龄分层后,STCTS失败的风险比与对照组无差异。以柄翻修为终点,STCTS队列的表现优于对照组(10年时,98%对96.8%;P < 0.001)。STCTS在65岁以下女性中实现了更好的生存率(P = 0.023)。以柄无菌性松动为终点,两个队列的生存率无差异(P = 0.085),调整后的风险比也无差异(P = 0.264)。以假体周围骨折为终点,STCTS的生存率更高(P < 0.001)。:用于原发性骨关节炎的THA中的STCTS提供了可靠的长期结果,并不逊于所有其他各种设计的非骨水泥柄。