Campbell Dana L M, Belson Sue, Dyall Tim R, Lea Jim M, Lee Caroline
Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;12(3):280. doi: 10.3390/ani12030280.
Enrichment during the indoor rearing of pullets destined for free-range systems may optimize pullet development including increasing motivated natural behaviors (termed 'positive behaviors') including foraging, dust bathing and chick play. Hy-Line Brown® chicks ( = 1700) were floor-reared indoors across 16 weeks with three enrichment treatments ( = 3 pens/treatment): (1) standard control, (2) weekly novel objects-'novelty', (3) perching/navigation structures-'structural'. At 16 weeks, pullets ( = 1386) were transferred to nine identical pens within rearing treatments with outdoor range access from 25 to 65 weeks. Video cameras recorded the pullet pens, adult indoor pens, and outside range. During rearing, observations of play behavior (running, frolicking, wing-flapping, sparring) in chicks at 2, 4 and 6 weeks (total of 432 thirty-second scans: 16 observations × 3 days × 9 pens) showed no overall effect of rearing treatment ( = 0.16). At 11 and 14 weeks only the 'novelty' hens were observed to increase their foraging across age ( = 0.009; dust bathing: = 0.40) (total of 612 thirty-second scans per behavior: 17 observations × 2 days × 2 age points × 9 pens). Observations of adult hens at 26, 31, 41, 50, 60 and 64 weeks showed that the structural hens exhibited overall more dust bathing and foraging than the control hens (both < 0.04) but both novelty and/or structural hens showed small increases depending on the behavior and location (total of 4104 scans per behavior: 17 observations × 2 days × 6 age points × 9 pens × 2 locations = 3672 + an additional 432 observations following daylight saving). Across age, adult hens differed in the degree of dust bathing performed inside or outside (both ≤ 0.001) and foraging outside ( < 0.001) but not inside ( = 0.15). For litter-reared pullets, additional enrichments may result in some long-term increases in positive behaviors.
对于即将进入散养系统的小母鸡,在室内饲养期间进行环境丰富化处理可能会优化小母鸡的发育,包括增加有动机的自然行为(称为“积极行为”),如觅食、沙浴和雏鸡嬉戏。海兰褐雏鸡((n = 1700))在室内地面饲养16周,设有三种环境丰富化处理方式(每种处理方式(n = 3)个围栏):(1)标准对照,(2)每周提供新物品——“新奇组”,(3)栖木/导航结构——“结构组”。16周时,小母鸡((n = 1386))被转移到九个相同的围栏中,在饲养处理方式下,从25周龄到65周龄可以进入室外活动区域。摄像机记录了小母鸡围栏、成年鸡室内围栏和室外活动区域的情况。在饲养期间,对2周龄、4周龄和6周龄雏鸡的嬉戏行为(奔跑、欢闹、扑翅、打斗)进行观察(总共432次30秒扫描:16次观察×3天×9个围栏),结果显示饲养处理方式没有总体影响((P = 0.16))。在11周龄和14周龄时,仅观察到“新奇组”母鸡随着年龄增长觅食行为增加((P = 0.009);沙浴行为:(P = 0.40))(每种行为总共612次30秒扫描:17次观察×2天×2个年龄点×9个围栏)。对26周龄、31周龄、41周龄、50周龄、60周龄和64周龄成年母鸡的观察表明,“结构组”母鸡总体上比对照母鸡表现出更多的沙浴和觅食行为(两者(P < 0.04)),但“新奇组”和/或“结构组”母鸡根据行为和位置表现出小幅增加(每种行为总共4104次扫描:17次观察×2天×6个年龄点×9个围栏×2个位置 = 3672次,加上夏令时调整后额外的432次观察)。在不同年龄阶段,成年母鸡在室内或室外进行沙浴的程度不同(两者(P ≤ 0.001)),在室外觅食的情况也不同((P < 0.001)),但在室内觅食情况没有差异((P = 0.15))。对于地面饲养的小母鸡,额外的环境丰富化处理可能会使积极行为在长期内有所增加。