Bari Md Saiful, Kheravii Sarbast K, Bajagai Yadav S, Wu Shu-Biao, Keerqin Chake, Campbell Dana L M
School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Feb 11;12:797396. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.797396. eCollection 2021.
Free-range pullets are reared indoors but the adult hens can go outside which is a mismatch that may reduce adaptation in the laying environment. Rearing enrichments might enhance pullet development and adaptations to subsequent free-range housing with impact on behavior and health measures including gut microbiota. Adult free-range hens vary in range use which may also be associated with microbiota composition. A total of 1,700 Hy-Line Brown chicks were reared indoors across 16 weeks with three enrichment treatment groups: "control" with standard litter housing, "novelty" with weekly changed novel objects, and "structural" with custom-designed perching structures in the pens. At 15 weeks, 45 pullet cecal contents were sampled before moving 1,386 pullets to the free-range housing system. At 25 weeks, range access commenced, and movements were tracked via radio-frequency identification technology. At 65 weeks, 91 hens were selected based on range use patterns ("indoor": no ranging; "high outdoor": daily ranging) across all rearing enrichment groups and cecal contents were collected for microbiota analysis via 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at V3-V4 regions. The most common bacteria in pullets were unclassified Barnesiellaceae, and and in hens Unclassified, , unclassified Lachnospiraceae, unclassified Bacteroidales, unclassified Paraprevotellaceae YRC22, and . The microbial alpha diversity was not significant within the enrichment/ranging groups (pullets: ≥ 0.17, hen rearing enrichment groups: ≥ 0.06, hen ranging groups: ≥ 0.54), but beta diversity significantly varied between these groups (pullets: ≤ 0.002, hen rearing enrichment groups: ≤ 0.001, hen ranging groups: ≤ 0.008). Among the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), the propionic acid content was higher ( = 0.03) in the novelty group of pullets than the control group. There were no other significant differences in the SCFA contents between the rearing enrichment groups (all ≥ 0.10), and the ranging groups (all ≥ 0.17). Most of the genera identified were more abundant in the indoor than high outdoor hens. Overall, rearing enrichments affected the cecal microbiota diversity of both pullets and adult hens and was able to distinguish hens that remained inside compared with hens that ranging daily for several hours.
散养小母鸡在室内饲养,但成年母鸡可以外出,这种不匹配可能会降低它们对产蛋环境的适应性。饲养环境的丰富化可能会促进小母鸡的发育,并使其更好地适应随后的散养环境,这对包括肠道微生物群在内的行为和健康指标都会产生影响。成年散养母鸡在活动范围的利用上存在差异,这也可能与微生物群组成有关。总共1700只海兰褐小鸡在室内饲养16周,分为三个丰富化处理组:“对照组”采用标准垫料饲养,“新奇组”每周更换新奇物品,“结构化组”在鸡舍内设置定制的栖息结构。15周时,在将1386只小母鸡转移到散养系统之前,采集了45只小母鸡的盲肠内容物样本。25周时,开始让母鸡进入活动范围,并通过射频识别技术跟踪它们的活动。65周时,根据所有饲养丰富化组的活动范围使用模式(“室内”:不外出活动;“高户外”:每天外出活动)挑选出91只母鸡,并收集它们的盲肠内容物,通过V3 - V4区域的16S rRNA扩增子测序进行微生物群分析。小母鸡中最常见的细菌是未分类的Barnesiellaceae,以及[此处原文缺失部分细菌名称];母鸡中则是未分类的[此处原文缺失部分细菌名称]、未分类的Lachnospiraceae、未分类的拟杆菌目、未分类的Paraprevotellaceae YRC22,以及[此处原文缺失部分细菌名称]。在丰富化/活动范围组内,微生物的α多样性不显著(小母鸡:[此处原文缺失具体数值]≥0.17,母鸡饲养丰富化组:[此处原文缺失具体数值]≥0.06,母鸡活动范围组:[此处原文缺失具体数值]≥0.54),但β多样性在这些组之间有显著差异(小母鸡:[此处原文缺失具体数值]≤0.002,母鸡饲养丰富化组:[此处原文缺失具体数值]≤0.001,母鸡活动范围组:[此处原文缺失具体数值]≤0.008)。在短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)中,小母鸡新奇组的丙酸含量高于对照组([此处原文缺失具体统计值]=0.03)。饲养丰富化组之间(所有[此处原文缺失具体统计值]≥0.10)以及活动范围组之间(所有[此处原文缺失具体统计值]≥0.17)的SCFA含量没有其他显著差异。所鉴定的大多数属在室内母鸡中比在高户外母鸡中更为丰富。总体而言,饲养丰富化影响了小母鸡和成年母鸡的盲肠微生物群多样性,并且能够区分一直留在室内的母鸡和每天外出活动数小时的母鸡。