Suppr超能文献

连续碳纤维增强3D打印聚合物复合材料的弹性模量和平铺(厚度方向)拉伸强度

Elastic Modulus and Flatwise (Through-Thickness) Tensile Strength of Continuous Carbon Fibre Reinforced 3D Printed Polymer Composites.

作者信息

Saeed Khalid, McIlhagger Alistair, Harkin-Jones Eileen, McGarrigle Cormac, Dixon Dorian, Archer Edward

机构信息

Engineering Research Institute, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, UK.

School of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Magee Campus, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 27;15(3):1002. doi: 10.3390/ma15031002.

Abstract

Additively manufactured composite specimens exhibit anisotropic properties, meaning that the elastic response changes with respect to orientation. Both in-plane and out-of-plane mechanical properties are important for designing purpose. Recent studies have characterised the in-plane performance. In this study, however, through-thickness tensile strength of 3D polymer composites were determined by printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyamide-based composite, manufactured using a Markforged Two 3D printer. This paper discusses sample fabrication and geometry, adhesive used, and testing procedure. Test standards used to determine out-of-plane properties are tedious as most of the premature failures occur between the specimens and the tabs. Two types of samples were printed according to ASTM flatwise tension standard and the results were compared to determine the geometry effect on the interlaminar strength. This test method consists of subjecting the printed sample to a uniaxial tensile force normal to the plane. With this method, the acceptable failure modes for tensile strength must be internal to the structure, not between the sample and the end tabs. Micro-computed tomography (µCT) was carried out to observe the porosity. Surface behaviour was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to see the voids and the distribution of the fibres in the samples. The results showed consistent values for tensile strength and elastic modulus for Araldite glue after initial trials (with some other adhesives) to determine a suitable choice of adhesive for bonding the samples with the tabs. Circular specimens have higher tensile strength and elastic modulus as compared to rectangular specimens.

摘要

增材制造的复合材料试样表现出各向异性特性,这意味着弹性响应会随方向而变化。平面内和平面外的力学性能对于设计目的都很重要。最近的研究已经对平面内性能进行了表征。然而,在本研究中,通过使用Markforged Two 3D打印机制造连续碳纤维增强热塑性聚酰胺基复合材料的打印,测定了3D聚合物复合材料的全厚度拉伸强度。本文讨论了样品制备、几何形状、使用的粘合剂以及测试程序。用于确定平面外性能的测试标准很繁琐,因为大多数过早失效发生在试样和标签之间。根据ASTM平面拉伸标准打印了两种类型的样品,并比较结果以确定几何形状对层间强度的影响。该测试方法包括使打印的样品承受垂直于平面的单轴拉力。使用这种方法,拉伸强度的可接受失效模式必须在结构内部,而不是在样品和端部标签之间。进行了微观计算机断层扫描(µCT)以观察孔隙率。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究表面行为,以查看样品中的空隙和纤维分布。在初步试验(使用一些其他粘合剂)以确定用于将样品与标签粘结的合适粘合剂选择后,结果显示Araldite胶水的拉伸强度和弹性模量值一致。与矩形试样相比,圆形试样具有更高的拉伸强度和弹性模量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3fd/8840265/9e0381f6fb0f/materials-15-01002-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验