Saeed Khalid, Mcilhagger Alistair, Dooher Thomas, Ullah Jawad, Manzoor Faisal, Velay Xavier, Archer Edward
Mechanical Engineering Department, Atlantic Technological University, Ash Lane Sligo, F91 YW50 County Sligo, Ireland.
Engineering Research Institute, Ulster University, York Street, Belfast BT1 5ED, Co. Antrim, UK.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;16(5):579. doi: 10.3390/polym16050579.
This study focuses on evaluating the fatigue life performance of 3D-printed polymer composites produced through the fused deposition modelling (FDM) technique. Fatigue life assessment is essential in designing components for industries like aerospace, medical, and automotive, as it provides an estimate of the component's safe service life during operation. While there is a lack of detailed research on the fatigue behaviour of 3D-printed polymer composites, this paper aims to fill that gap. Fatigue tests were conducted on the 3D-printed polymer composites under various loading conditions, and static (tensile) tests were performed to determine their ultimate tensile strength. The fatigue testing load ranged from 80% to 98% of the total static load. The results showed that the fatigue life of the pressed samples using a platen press was significantly better than that of the non-pressed samples. Samples subjected to fatigue testing at 80% of the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) did not experience failure even after 1 million cycles, while samples tested at 90% of UTS failed after 50,000 cycles, with the failure being characterized as splitting and clamp area failure. This study also included a lap shear analysis of the 3D-printed samples, comparing those that were bonded using a two-part Araldite glue to those that were fabricated as a single piece using the Markforged Mark Two 3D printer. In summary, this study sheds light on the fatigue life performance of 3D-printed polymer composites fabricated using the FDM technique. The results suggest that the use of post-printing platen press improved the fatigue life of 3D-printed samples, and that single printed samples have better strength of about 265 MPa than adhesively bonded samples in which the strength was 56 MPa.
本研究聚焦于评估通过熔融沉积建模(FDM)技术生产的3D打印聚合物复合材料的疲劳寿命性能。疲劳寿命评估在航空航天、医疗和汽车等行业的零部件设计中至关重要,因为它能估计零部件在运行期间的安全使用寿命。虽然目前对3D打印聚合物复合材料的疲劳行为缺乏详细研究,但本文旨在填补这一空白。对3D打印聚合物复合材料在各种加载条件下进行了疲劳试验,并进行了静态(拉伸)试验以确定其极限抗拉强度。疲劳试验载荷范围为总静态载荷的80%至98%。结果表明,使用平板压机压制的样品的疲劳寿命明显优于未压制的样品。在极限抗拉强度(UTS)的80%下进行疲劳试验的样品即使在100万次循环后也未发生失效,而在UTS的90%下进行试验的样品在50000次循环后失效,失效特征为开裂和夹具区域失效。本研究还包括对3D打印样品的搭接剪切分析,将使用双组分Araldite胶水粘结的样品与使用Markforged Mark Two 3D打印机一体制造的样品进行比较。总之,本研究揭示了使用FDM技术制造的3D打印聚合物复合材料的疲劳寿命性能。结果表明,打印后使用平板压机提高了3D打印样品的疲劳寿命,并且单个打印样品的强度约为265MPa,优于粘结样品,后者的强度为56MPa。