Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Posts in molars. Must we?后牙植入。我们必须这样做吗？
J Can Dent Assoc. 1986 May;52(5):371-2.
2
In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars.牙髓治疗后磨牙桩核技术的体外比较
J Endod. 1986 Sep;12(9):382-7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80071-1.
3
An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars.两种用于根管治疗后磨牙的桩核技术的体外比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Apr;51(4):509-14. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90303-2.
4
5
Improving the seal of amalgam cores with cemented dowels: a comparative in vitro radioactive tracer study.
J Endod. 2001 Apr;27(4):288-91. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200104000-00015.
6
Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars with and without glass fiber post in combination with a zirconia-ceramic crown.根管治疗后的下颌磨牙在有无玻璃纤维桩与氧化锆陶瓷冠联合使用情况下的抗折性及失败模式
J Dent. 2008 Jul;36(7):513-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 May 13.
7
A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems.两种不同复合树脂系统粘结的纤维桩的存活率比较。
Br Dent J. 2008 Dec 13;205(11):E23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.1023. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
8
An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a solid post and core.
J Endod. 1984 Mar;10(3):91-5. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80222-8.
9
[Evaluation of various technics used in the reconstruction of dowels].[用于桩钉重建的各种技术的评估]
Odontol Mexico. 1983 May;1(2):7-17.
10
An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a custom hollow post and core.
J Endod. 1984 Mar;10(3):96-100. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80223-X.
Zotero 插件