• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Miller 0 号刀片的声门视图优于 Macintosh 0 号刀片的声门视图:一项随机试验。

Glottic views using a Miller size 0 blade are superior to those from a Macintosh size 0 blade in neonates: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Oishei Children's Hospital, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(3):246-251. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.108561.

DOI:10.5114/ait.2021.108561
PMID:35164484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10165327/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Both the Miller and Macintosh blades are commonly used during laryngoscopy in infants and children, although the glottic views have not been compared in neonates. This study compared the glottic views with the Miller and Macintosh size 0 blades in neonates when the blades were placed above and below the epiglottis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty anaesthetized and paralyzed neonates undergoing elective surgery were enrolled and randomized to either the Miller or Macintosh size 0 blade. Two glottic views were obtained in random order in each neonate and were photographed using the same blade: lifting the epiglottis first then the tongue base or vice versa. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scores were evaluated with each view. The POGO scores and cardiorespiratory variables were then analysed.

RESULTS

The POGO scores using the Miller blade to lift both the epiglottis and the tongue base were similar, whereas the scores using the Macintosh blade to lift the epiglottis were greater than those to lift the tongue base. The POGO scores using the Miller blade in both positions were significantly greater than those using the Macintosh blade in the corresponding positions (P = 0.0001). The heart rate using the Miller blade was greater than that using the Macintosh blade (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In neonates, the glottic views using the Miller size 0 blade to lift both the epiglottis and the tongue base were deemed to be excellent and superior to those using the Macintosh blade in both positions.

摘要

简介

在婴儿和儿童的喉镜检查中,米勒刀片和麦克intosh 刀片都被广泛使用,尽管尚未在新生儿中比较过声门视图。本研究比较了在将 epiglottis 置于叶片上方和下方时,新生儿使用 Miller 和 Macintosh 尺寸 0 叶片的声门视图。

材料和方法

40 名接受择期手术的麻醉和瘫痪新生儿被纳入并随机分为 Miller 或 Macintosh 尺寸 0 刀片组。在每个新生儿中以随机顺序获得两种声门视图,并使用相同的叶片拍照:首先提起 epiglottis,然后提起舌骨基底或反之亦然。用每种视图评估声门开放百分比(POGO)评分。然后分析 POGO 评分和心肺变量。

结果

使用 Miller 叶片提起 epiglottis 和舌骨基底时的 POGO 评分相似,而使用 Macintosh 叶片提起 epiglottis 的评分大于提起舌骨基底的评分。两种位置使用 Miller 叶片的 POGO 评分均显著大于相应位置使用 Macintosh 叶片的 POGO 评分(P = 0.0001)。使用 Miller 叶片时的心率大于使用 Macintosh 叶片时的心率(P = 0.0001)。

结论

在新生儿中,使用 Miller 尺寸 0 叶片提起 epiglottis 和舌骨基底的声门视图被认为是极好的,并且优于在两个位置使用 Macintosh 叶片。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/9c6eb640ea5f/AIT-53-44954-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/8ab9a9af077f/AIT-53-44954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/1efbd3871da1/AIT-53-44954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/8d1e9d6fbc42/AIT-53-44954-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/ee4bb6dd7732/AIT-53-44954-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/9c6eb640ea5f/AIT-53-44954-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/8ab9a9af077f/AIT-53-44954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/1efbd3871da1/AIT-53-44954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/8d1e9d6fbc42/AIT-53-44954-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/ee4bb6dd7732/AIT-53-44954-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5df/10165327/9c6eb640ea5f/AIT-53-44954-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Glottic views using a Miller size 0 blade are superior to those from a Macintosh size 0 blade in neonates: a randomized trial.使用 Miller 0 号刀片的声门视图优于 Macintosh 0 号刀片的声门视图:一项随机试验。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(3):246-251. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.108561.
2
Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age.在2岁以下婴幼儿中,比较使用1号米勒喉镜和麦金托什喉镜叶片抬起会厌或舌根时的喉镜视野。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Nov;113(5):869-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu228. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
A randomized trial of the glottic views with the classic Miller, Wis-Hipple and C-MAC (videolaryngoscope and direct views) straight size 1 blades in young children.一项针对幼儿使用经典米勒喉镜、威斯-希普尔喉镜和C-MAC(视频喉镜和直视喉镜)直型1号镜片进行声门视野观察的随机试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Mar;60:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
4
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Miller Laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Direct Visualization of the Glottic Opening.Miller 喉镜与 McGrath-MAC 视频喉镜在直接观察声门开口时的效果比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 28;60(1):62. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010062.
5
Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?在小儿患者中,米勒喉镜叶片真的比麦金托什喉镜叶片能提供更好的喉镜视野和插管条件吗?
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Aug;24(8):825-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12394. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
6
Comparative efficacy of C-MAC Miller videolaryngoscope versus McGrath MAC size "1" videolaryngoscope in neonates and infants undergoing surgical procedures under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled trial.在全身麻醉下接受手术的新生儿和婴儿中,C-MAC Miller 视频喉镜与 McGrath MAC size "1" 视频喉镜的比较疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Oct;31(10):1089-1096. doi: 10.1111/pan.14244. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
7
View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.与使用麦金托什喉镜相比,使用米勒喉镜及舌旁入路获得的喉部视野。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Sep;36(5):717-21. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0803600515.
8
The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.加的夫小儿喉镜叶片:与米勒1号和麦金托什2号喉镜叶片的比较。
Anaesthesia. 2004 Oct;59(10):1016-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03839.x.
9
The Importance of Median Glossoepiglottic Fold Engagement on Laryngeal View and Tracheal Intubation Success in Children.舌面会厌皱襞接触对儿童喉镜显露和气管插管成功率的重要性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;81(6):658-666. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.12.027. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
10
Effect of the Macintosh curved blade size on direct laryngoscopic view in edentulous patients.麦金托什弯形叶片尺寸对无牙患者直接喉镜视野的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;36(1):120-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.050. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Vie Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Adults With an Expected Easy Airway: A Randomized Controlled Trial.可视喉镜与麦金托什喉镜用于预计气道情况简单的成人患者的比较:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2025 Jul 23;17(7):e88566. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88566. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Association between video laryngoscopy characteristics and successful neonatal tracheal intubation: a prospective study.视频喉镜特征与新生儿气管插管成功之间的关联:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Jul 1. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2024-326992.
3
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Miller Laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Direct Visualization of the Glottic Opening.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of a Shoulder Roll During Laryngoscopy in Infants: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Crossover Study.在婴儿喉镜检查中使用肩部滚动的效果:一项随机、单盲、交叉研究。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1210-1216. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004802.
2
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.新生儿气管插管时视频喉镜与直接喉镜的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub3.
3
Analysis of unsuccessful intubations in neonates using videolaryngoscopy recordings.
Miller 喉镜与 McGrath-MAC 视频喉镜在直接观察声门开口时的效果比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 28;60(1):62. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010062.
4
A Prospective Comparative Study of Laryngeal Glottic View Using the Vie Scope versus Standard Macintosh Laryngoscope in Morbidly Obese Patients.病态肥胖患者使用Vie喉镜与标准麦金托什喉镜进行喉声门视野的前瞻性比较研究。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 May 16;19:405-411. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S377585. eCollection 2023.
使用视频喉镜记录分析新生儿插管失败。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Sep;103(5):F408-F412. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313628. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
Airway management complications in children with difficult tracheal intubation from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry: a prospective cohort analysis.儿科困难气道(PeDI)登记处中困难气管插管患儿的气道管理并发症:一项前瞻性队列分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jan;4(1):37-48. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00508-1. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age.在2岁以下婴幼儿中,比较使用1号米勒喉镜和麦金托什喉镜叶片抬起会厌或舌根时的喉镜视野。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Nov;113(5):869-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu228. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
6
Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?在小儿患者中,米勒喉镜叶片真的比麦金托什喉镜叶片能提供更好的喉镜视野和插管条件吗?
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Aug;24(8):825-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12394. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
7
Incidence and predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in 11,219 pediatric anesthesia procedures.11219例小儿麻醉手术中困难喉镜检查的发生率及预测因素
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):729-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03813.x. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
8
A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants.经口明视气管插管术在新生儿和婴儿中应用 GlideScope Cobalt®视频喉镜与传统直接喉镜的前瞻性随机等效性试验。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):622-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea4d.
9
A new laryngoscope for intubation of infants.
Anesthesiology. 1946 Mar;7:205. doi: 10.1097/00000542-194603000-00014.
10
Failure of pediatric and neonatal trainees to meet Canadian Neonatal Resuscitation Program standards for neonatal intubation.儿科和新生儿培训生未能达到加拿大新生儿复苏计划新生儿插管标准。
J Perinatol. 2010 Mar;30(3):182-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.152. Epub 2009 Oct 8.