Kreuzfeld Steffi, Felsing Christoph, Seibt Reingard
Institute for Preventive Medicine of the Rostock University Medical Center, St.-Georg-Str. 108, D-18055, Rostock, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12680-5.
The work of teachers has changed due to an increase in the range of tasks. However, there is a lack of current information on working hours, task distribution and the possible health effects.
For the first time for Germany as a whole, a cross-sectional survey determined how long teachers at upper-level secondary schools work per week, what influences their working hours and how different recording methods affect the total working hours. To this end, 6,109 full-time teachers estimated their working hours based on twelve categories and then documented these daily over 4 weeks. Afterwards, the effects of long working hours on teachers' ability to recover and emotional exhaustion were analysed.
The article shows the large interindividual variance in the working hours of teachers and a significant influence of sex, age, and subject profile. Self-reported working hours varied substantially by method used to record working time with work time reported via daily diaries totaling 2 h per week more than hours recorded by a single estimation. A substantial proportion of the teachers (36%) work longer per week than European guidelines allow (> 48 h); 15% work even more than 55 h per week. Teachers who work more than 45 h per week suffer more often from inability to recover (46%) and emotional exhaustion (32%) than teachers who work less than 40 h per week (26% and 22% respectively).
Taking professional experience and teaching subjects into account could in future contribute to a fairer distribution of workload among teachers. This could protect individual teachers from long working hours, ensure sufficient recovery and also reduce the risk of emotional exhaustion. In order to identify teachers whose health is at risk at an early stage, voluntary preventive care offers would be considerably helpful.
由于任务范围的增加,教师的工作发生了变化。然而,目前缺乏关于工作时间、任务分配以及可能的健康影响的信息。
作为首次针对德国全国范围的调查,一项横断面研究确定了高中教师每周工作时长、影响其工作时间的因素以及不同记录方法如何影响总工作时长。为此,6109名全职教师根据12个类别估算了他们的工作时间,然后在4周内每天记录这些时间。之后,分析了长时间工作对教师恢复能力和情感耗竭的影响。
文章显示了教师工作时间存在较大的个体差异,以及性别、年龄和学科概况的显著影响。自我报告的工作时间因记录工作时间的方法不同而有很大差异,通过每日日记报告的工作时间比单次估算记录的工作时间每周总共多2小时。相当一部分教师(36%)每周工作时间超过欧洲指南允许的时长(>48小时);15%的教师每周工作甚至超过55小时。每周工作超过45小时的教师比每周工作少于40小时的教师更常出现无法恢复(46%对26%)和情感耗竭(32%对22%)的情况。
考虑专业经验和教学科目未来可能有助于在教师之间更公平地分配工作量。这可以保护个别教师避免长时间工作,确保充分恢复,还能降低情感耗竭的风险。为了早期识别健康面临风险的教师,自愿性预防保健服务将非常有帮助。