• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 2249 例中国汉族人群侧颅面的聚类分析建立数字化诊断模板

Development of digital diagnostic templates by cluster analysis based on 2249 lateral cephalograms of Chinese Han population.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Cranial-Facial Growth and Development Center, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.

First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 37A Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2022 Feb 14;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00309-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13005-022-00309-2
PMID:35164789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8842905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To establish the digital diagnostic templates by cluster analysis based on a set of cephalometric films and evaluate the outcome of the different treatment methods in the patients affiliated to the same cephalometric morphology template (CMT). These templates could be used for the automatic diagnosis of dentofacial deformities and prediction of treatment outcomes in the future.

METHODS

In this study, we assessed the coordinates of 60 different landmarks on the cephalograms of 2249 patients (14.35 ± 4.99 years, range from 7 to 62) with dentofacial deformities. The cephalometric data were subjected to dentist for clustering without a priori pattern definitions to generate biologically informative CMTs. Three templates were selected to evaluate the treatment outcome of patients affiliated to the same CMT.

RESULTS

The cluster analysis yielded 21 distinct groups. The total discriminant accuracy was 89.1%, while the cross-validation accuracy was 85.0%, showing that the clusters were robust. All CMTs were automatically created and drawn using a computer, based on the average coordinates of each cluster. Individuals affiliated to the same CMT showed similar dentofacial features. We also evaluated differences in the outcomes of patients affiliated to the same CMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated the utility of clustering methods for grouping dentofacial deformities with similar dentofacial features. Clustering methods can be used to evaluate the differences in the outcomes of patients affiliated to the same CMT, which has good clinical application value.

摘要

背景

通过聚类分析建立基于一组头颅侧位片的数字化诊断模板,并评估具有相同头颅测量形态模板(CMT)的患者的不同治疗方法的结果。这些模板可用于未来的牙颌面畸形自动诊断和治疗效果预测。

方法

本研究评估了 2249 例牙颌面畸形患者(年龄 14.35±4.99 岁,7~62 岁)的 60 个不同标志点的坐标。对头颅侧位片数据进行聚类分析,无需先验模式定义,以生成具有生物学意义的 CMT。选择 3 个模板来评估具有相同 CMT 的患者的治疗效果。

结果

聚类分析产生了 21 个不同的组。总判别准确率为 89.1%,交叉验证准确率为 85.0%,表明聚类是稳健的。所有 CMT 均基于每个聚类的平均坐标,使用计算机自动创建和绘制。具有相同 CMT 的个体具有相似的牙颌面特征。我们还评估了具有相同 CMT 的患者治疗效果的差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,聚类方法可用于分组具有相似牙颌面特征的牙颌面畸形。聚类方法可用于评估具有相同 CMT 的患者治疗效果的差异,具有良好的临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/6ba85274d11c/13005_2022_309_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/df7316889345/13005_2022_309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/bbacdaf563f8/13005_2022_309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/929e7e8f2894/13005_2022_309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/e480e3d7a290/13005_2022_309_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/6ba85274d11c/13005_2022_309_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/df7316889345/13005_2022_309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/bbacdaf563f8/13005_2022_309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/929e7e8f2894/13005_2022_309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/e480e3d7a290/13005_2022_309_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49c1/8842905/6ba85274d11c/13005_2022_309_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of digital diagnostic templates by cluster analysis based on 2249 lateral cephalograms of Chinese Han population.基于 2249 例中国汉族人群侧颅面的聚类分析建立数字化诊断模板
Head Face Med. 2022 Feb 14;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13005-022-00309-2.
2
Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.全自动系统用于准确定位和分析侧位头颅片中的头影测量标志点。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 20;6:33581. doi: 10.1038/srep33581.
3
Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.基于头影测量X线片和三维CT扫描的颅面解剖标志点可靠性比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 Mar;34(2):111-6. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0111_cotroc_2.3.co_2.
4
The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.口腔颌面影像学中头影测量的可靠性:锥形束计算机断层扫描与二维数字化头颅侧位片的比较
Indian J Dent Res. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):370-377. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.191884.
5
Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible?基于骨骼与软组织的头影测量分析:相关性是否具有可重复性?
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Mar;77(2):135-141. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1515443. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
6
Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.传统头颅侧位片、数字化头颅侧位片和CT衍生头颅侧位片的测量:一项比较研究。
Aust Orthod J. 2012 Nov;28(2):232-9.
7
A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.扫描的头颅侧位片与相应原始X光片的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.029.
8
Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable?在固定和自然头位下拍摄的数字化头影测量中的正畸标志点和变量是否可靠?
Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):54-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
9
Dental informatics to characterize patients with dentofacial deformities.口腔信息学用于描述牙颌面畸形患者的特征。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e67862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067862. Print 2013.
10
Comparison of the Reliability of Anatomic Landmarks based on PA Cephalometric Radiographs and 3D CT Scans in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.基于正位头影测量X线片和三维CT扫描对颜面不对称患者解剖标志可靠性的比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Sep-Dec;4(3):213-23. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1112. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of tooth anatomy in adults with ideal occlusion: A preliminary study.成人理想咬合状态下的牙齿解剖结构分析:一项初步研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Feb;157(2):218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.024.
2
Progeny Clustering: A Method to Identify Biological Phenotypes.子代聚类:一种识别生物学表型的方法。
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 12;5:12894. doi: 10.1038/srep12894.
3
GWAS of dental caries patterns in the permanent dentition.GWAS 分析恒牙龋齿模式。
J Dent Res. 2013 Jan;92(1):38-44. doi: 10.1177/0022034512463579. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
4
Clustering tooth surfaces into biologically informative caries outcomes.将牙面聚类为具有生物学信息的龋病结局。
J Dent Res. 2013 Jan;92(1):32-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034512463241. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
5
Caries patterns in the primary dentition: cluster analysis of a sample of 5169 Arizona children 5-59 months of age.乳牙龋病模式:亚利桑那州 5-59 个月龄 5169 名儿童样本的聚类分析。
Int J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;1(4):189-95. doi: 10.4248/IJOS09077.
6
Craniofacial morphometric analysis of mandibular prognathism.下颌前突的颅面形态测量分析
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Mar;33(3):183-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01563.x.
7
Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.上颌前牵引联合颏兜矫治器对颌面复合体治疗效果的几何形态测量评估
J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Oct;32(10):720-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01504.x.
8
Classification of the skeletal variation in normal occlusion.正常咬合中骨骼变异的分类。
Angle Orthod. 2005 May;75(3):311-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[311:COTSVI]2.0.CO;2.
9
Growth prediction in Class III patients using cluster and discriminant function analysis.使用聚类和判别函数分析预测Ⅲ类患者的生长情况。
Eur J Orthod. 2003 Dec;25(6):599-608. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.6.599.
10
Measurement on radiographs.X线片测量。
J Dent Res. 1962 May-Jun;41:672-83. doi: 10.1177/00220345620410032101.