• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全自动系统用于准确定位和分析侧位头颅片中的头影测量标志点。

Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.

机构信息

Centre for Imaging Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom.

Graduate Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 20;6:33581. doi: 10.1038/srep33581.

DOI:10.1038/srep33581
PMID:27645567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5028843/
Abstract

Cephalometric tracing is a standard analysis tool for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a fully automatic landmark annotation (FALA) system for finding cephalometric landmarks in lateral cephalograms and its application to the classification of skeletal malformations. Digital cephalograms of 400 subjects (age range: 7-76 years) were available. All cephalograms had been manually traced by two experienced orthodontists with 19 cephalometric landmarks, and eight clinical parameters had been calculated for each subject. A FALA system to locate the 19 landmarks in lateral cephalograms was developed. The system was evaluated via comparison to the manual tracings, and the automatically located landmarks were used for classification of the clinical parameters. The system achieved an average point-to-point error of 1.2 mm, and 84.7% of landmarks were located within the clinically accepted precision range of 2.0 mm. The automatic landmark localisation performance was within the inter-observer variability between two clinical experts. The automatic classification achieved an average classification accuracy of 83.4% which was comparable to an experienced orthodontist. The FALA system rapidly and accurately locates and analyses cephalometric landmarks in lateral cephalograms, and has the potential to significantly improve the clinical work flow in orthodontic treatment.

摘要

头影测量描记是正畸诊断和治疗计划的标准分析工具。本研究旨在开发和验证一种用于在侧位头颅片中寻找头影测量标志点的全自动标志点标注(FALA)系统,并将其应用于骨骼畸形的分类。共有 400 名受试者的数字侧位头颅片(年龄范围:7-76 岁)可供使用。所有的头颅片均由两位经验丰富的正畸医生手动描记了 19 个头影测量标志点,并为每位受试者计算了 8 个临床参数。开发了一种用于在侧位头颅片中定位 19 个标志点的 FALA 系统。该系统通过与手动描记进行比较进行了评估,并将自动定位的标志点用于临床参数的分类。该系统的平均点到点误差为 1.2mm,84.7%的标志点位于临床可接受的 2.0mm 精度范围内。自动标志点定位性能在两位临床专家的观察者间变异性内。自动分类的平均分类准确率为 83.4%,与经验丰富的正畸医生相当。FALA 系统可以快速、准确地定位和分析侧位头颅片中的头影测量标志点,有可能显著改善正畸治疗的临床工作流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/1203021e9567/srep33581-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/19fd85a68d0a/srep33581-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/b50228a85c07/srep33581-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/481b42590fa5/srep33581-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/849ccc5add22/srep33581-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/1203021e9567/srep33581-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/19fd85a68d0a/srep33581-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/b50228a85c07/srep33581-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/481b42590fa5/srep33581-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/849ccc5add22/srep33581-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1f/5028843/1203021e9567/srep33581-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.全自动系统用于准确定位和分析侧位头颅片中的头影测量标志点。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 20;6:33581. doi: 10.1038/srep33581.
2
Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable?在固定和自然头位下拍摄的数字化头影测量中的正畸标志点和变量是否可靠?
Int Orthod. 2020 Mar;18(1):54-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.用于在数字图像上自动识别头影测量标志点的细胞神经网络评估。
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:717102. doi: 10.1155/2009/717102. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
4
Ceph-Net: automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on scanned lateral cephalograms from children and adolescents using an attention-based stacked regression network.Ceph-Net:使用基于注意力的堆叠回归网络自动检测儿童和青少年扫描侧位头颅影像中的头影测量标志点。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03452-7.
5
Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.开发一个自动的头颅侧位标志点识别程序并评估其性能。
Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(4):327-43.
6
Automatic Analysis of Lateral Cephalograms Based on Multiresolution Decision Tree Regression Voting.基于多分辨率决策树回归投票的侧位头颅X 光片自动分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Nov 19;2018:1797502. doi: 10.1155/2018/1797502. eCollection 2018.
7
Evaluation and Comparison of Anatomical Landmark Detection Methods for Cephalometric X-Ray Images: A Grand Challenge.头影测量 X 射线图像解剖标志检测方法的评估与比较:一项重大挑战。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Sep;34(9):1890-900. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2412951. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
[Automated cephalometric landmark identification and location based on convolutional neural network].基于卷积神经网络的自动头影测量标志点识别与定位
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 9;58(12):1249-1256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20230829-00118.
9
Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.通过对数字化头颅侧位片进行全自动和半自动评估实现头影测量分析的精度
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Sep;38(6):401-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/85543699.
10
Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的自动头影测量分析准确性评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02881-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Multimodal deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection and treatment prediction.用于头影测量标志点检测和治疗预测的多模态深度学习
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):25205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06229-w.
2
Characteristics, licensing, and ethical considerations of openly accessible oral-maxillofacial imaging datasets: a systematic review.公开可获取的口腔颌面影像数据集的特征、许可及伦理考量:一项系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 5;8(1):412. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01818-5.
3
Automated Landmark Detection and Lip Thickness Classification Using a Convolutional Neural Network in Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs.

本文引用的文献

1
A benchmark for comparison of dental radiography analysis algorithms.一种用于比较牙科放射摄影分析算法的基准。
Med Image Anal. 2016 Jul;31:63-76. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
2
Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.正畸医生与口腔颌面放射科医生之间头影测量标志点的变异性:一项对比研究。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Dec;45(4):213-20. doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.213. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
3
Robust and Accurate Shape Model Matching Using Random Forest Regression-Voting.
使用卷积神经网络在头颅侧位X线片上进行自动地标检测和唇厚度分类
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(12):1468. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121468.
4
Accuracy of automated analysis in cephalometry.头影测量中自动分析的准确性。
J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):830-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.012. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
5
Automated orthodontic diagnosis via self-supervised learning and multi-attribute classification using lateral cephalograms.通过自我监督学习和使用头颅侧位片的多属性分类进行自动正畸诊断。
Biomed Eng Online. 2025 Feb 4;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12938-025-01345-0.
6
Applications of artificial intelligence in orthodontics: a bibliometric and visual analysis.人工智能在正畸学中的应用:文献计量与可视化分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 16;29(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06158-y.
7
Using AI in Optimizing Oral and Dental Diagnoses-A Narrative Review.人工智能在优化口腔诊断中的应用——一篇叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;14(24):2804. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242804.
8
Does the FARNet neural network algorithm accurately identify Posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks?FARNet 神经网络算法能否准确识别后前头颅定位标志点?
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01478-z.
9
Clinical validity and precision of deep learning-based cone-beam computed tomography automatic landmarking algorithm.基于深度学习的锥束计算机断层扫描自动地标算法的临床有效性和精度
Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Sep;54(3):240-250. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240009. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
10
Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Class III Malocclusions in Children.用于诊断儿童III类错牙合畸形的机器学习算法
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;11(7):762. doi: 10.3390/children11070762.
基于随机森林回归投票的稳健精确形状模型匹配。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2015 Sep;37(9):1862-74. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2382106.
4
Evaluation and Comparison of Anatomical Landmark Detection Methods for Cephalometric X-Ray Images: A Grand Challenge.头影测量 X 射线图像解剖标志检测方法的评估与比较:一项重大挑战。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Sep;34(9):1890-900. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2412951. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Fully automatic segmentation of the proximal femur using random forest regression voting.基于随机森林回归投票的股骨近端全自动分割。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Aug;32(8):1462-72. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2258030. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
6
The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis.正畸诊断、分类、治疗计划及预后中的法兰克福-下颌平面角
Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946 Apr;32:175-230. doi: 10.1016/0096-6347(46)90001-4.
7
Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis.面部关系的变异;它们在治疗和预后中的意义。
Am J Orthod. 1948 Oct;34(10):812-40. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3.
8
An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.用于自动识别头影测量标志点的主动形状模型评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2000 Oct;22(5):499-508. doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.5.499.
9
Assessment of an automated cephalometric analysis system.一种自动头影测量分析系统的评估
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Oct;18(5):471-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.5.471.
10
A method of cephalometric evaluation.一种头影测量评估方法。
Am J Orthod. 1984 Dec;86(6):449-69. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90352-x.