• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在急诊医学中的应用:益处、风险和建议。

Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Benefits, Risks, and Recommendations.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.

Center for Bioethics, Medical Humanities, and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;62(4):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.001
PMID:35164977
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) can be described as the use of computers to perform tasks that formerly required human cognition. The American Medical Association prefers the term 'augmented intelligence' over 'artificial intelligence' to emphasize the assistive role of computers in enhancing physician skills as opposed to replacing them. The integration of AI into emergency medicine, and clinical practice at large, has increased in recent years, and that trend is likely to continue.

DISCUSSION

AI has demonstrated substantial potential benefit for physicians and patients. These benefits are transforming the therapeutic relationship from the traditional physician-patient dyad into a triadic doctor-patient-machine relationship. New AI technologies, however, require careful vetting, legal standards, patient safeguards, and provider education. Emergency physicians (EPs) should recognize the limits and risks of AI as well as its potential benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

EPs must learn to partner with, not capitulate to, AI. AI has proven to be superior to, or on a par with, certain physician skills, such as interpreting radiographs and making diagnoses based on visual cues, such as skin cancer. AI can provide cognitive assistance, but EPs must interpret AI results within the clinical context of individual patients. They must also advocate for patient confidentiality, professional liability coverage, and the essential role of specialty-trained EPs.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)可以被描述为使用计算机来执行以前需要人类认知的任务。美国医学协会更喜欢使用“增强智能”而不是“人工智能”,以强调计算机在增强医生技能方面的辅助作用,而不是取代它们。近年来,人工智能已经越来越多地融入急诊医学和临床实践中,而且这种趋势很可能会持续下去。

讨论

人工智能已经为医生和患者带来了巨大的潜在好处。这些好处正在将治疗关系从传统的医患二元关系转变为医生-患者-机器的三方关系。然而,新的人工智能技术需要经过仔细的审查、法律标准、患者保护和提供者教育。急诊医师(EP)应该认识到人工智能的局限性和风险,以及其潜在的好处。

结论

EP 必须学会与人工智能合作,而不是屈从于人工智能。人工智能已经被证明在某些医生技能方面优于或与某些医生技能相当,例如解读 X 光片和根据视觉线索(如皮肤癌)做出诊断。人工智能可以提供认知辅助,但 EP 必须在个体患者的临床背景下解释人工智能的结果。他们还必须倡导患者的保密性、专业责任保险和经过专业培训的 EP 的重要作用。

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Benefits, Risks, and Recommendations.人工智能在急诊医学中的应用:益处、风险和建议。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;62(4):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians.根据加拿大医生的说法,急诊医学对人工智能的需求和期望。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w.
3
Informed consent for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A practical guide.知情同意在急诊医学中的人工智能应用:实用指南。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;76:225-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.022. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
The difficult role of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Liability: to err is not only human.人工智能在医疗责任中的困境:犯错的不只是人类。
Clin Ter. 2021 Nov 22;172(6):527-528. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2372.
5
Compliance with medical recommendations depending on the use of artificial intelligence as a diagnostic method.对医学建议的依从性取决于是否使用人工智能作为诊断方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01596-6.
6
Artificial intelligence (AI) or augmented intelligence? How big data and AI are transforming healthcare: Challenges and opportunities.人工智能(AI)还是增强智能?大数据和人工智能如何改变医疗保健:挑战与机遇。
S Afr Med J. 2023 Dec 31;114(1):22-26. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i1.1631.
7
Demystifying Medico-legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Molecular Imaging and Therapy.医学法律挑战的解析——人工智能在分子影像与治疗中的应用。
PET Clin. 2022 Jan;17(1):41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.08.002.
8
Against the iDoctor: why artificial intelligence should not replace physician judgment.反对智能医生:为何人工智能不应取代医生的判断。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 Apr;39(2):91-110. doi: 10.1007/s11017-018-9442-3.
9
[Legal integration of artificial intelligence into internal medicine : Data protection, regulatory, reimbursement and liability questions].[人工智能在医学内科中的合法整合:数据保护、监管、报销及责任问题]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;64(11):1044-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00108-023-01598-8. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
10
When Does Physician Use of AI Increase Liability?当医生使用人工智能时会增加哪些责任?
J Nucl Med. 2021 Jan;62(1):17-21. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.256032. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
AI in Fracture Detection: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Physician Acceptance Using the UTAUT Model.骨折检测中的人工智能:使用UTAUT模型对医生接受度的跨学科分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;15(16):2117. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162117.
2
Comparison of performance of artificial intelligence tools in answering emergency medicine question pool: ChatGPT 4.0, Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot.人工智能工具在回答急诊医学题库问题方面的性能比较:ChatGPT 4.0、谷歌Gemini和微软Copilot
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):968-972. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.11178.
3
Use of artificial intelligence for reverse referral between a hospital emergency department and a primary urgent care center.
人工智能在医院急诊科与基层紧急护理中心之间反向转诊中的应用。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 3;7:1546467. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1546467. eCollection 2025.
4
The diagnostic performance of automatic B-lines detection for evaluating pulmonary edema in the emergency department among novice point-of-care ultrasound practitioners.急诊科新手床旁超声从业者中自动B线检测在评估肺水肿方面的诊断性能。
Emerg Radiol. 2025 Apr;32(2):241-246. doi: 10.1007/s10140-025-02319-4. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Ethical attitudes and perspectives of AI use in medicine between Croatian and Slovenian faculty members of school of medicine: Cross-sectional study.克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚医学院教员对医学中人工智能使用的伦理态度和观点:横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0310599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310599. eCollection 2024.
6
Artificial Intelligence and medical specialties: support or substitution?人工智能与医学专业:支持还是替代?
Med Pharm Rep. 2024 Oct;97(4):409-418. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2696. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
7
Evaluating ChatGPT's moral competence in health care-related ethical problems.评估ChatGPT在医疗保健相关伦理问题中的道德能力。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Jul 9;7(3):ooae065. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae065. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing the Functioning of Emergency Departments; a Systematic Review of Current Solutions.人工智能在优化急诊科运作中的应用;当前解决方案的系统综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 27;12(1):e22. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2110. eCollection 2024.
9
Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Emergency Medical Services: Perspectives on the Implications of Generative AI in Prehospital Care.人工智能聊天机器人与紧急医疗服务:关于生成式人工智能在院前护理中影响的观点
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 7;15:289-292. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S420764. eCollection 2023.
10
Exploring the Critical Driving Forces and Strategy Adoption Paths of Professional Competency Development for Various Emergency Physicians Based on the Hybrid MCDM Approach.基于混合多准则决策方法探索各类急诊医师专业能力发展的关键驱动因素及策略采用路径
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;11(4):471. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040471.