• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素相关性肠胃炎实验室诊断的注意事项

Considerations in the laboratory diagnosis of antibiotic-associated gastroenteritis.

作者信息

Ryan R W

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;4(3 Suppl):79S-86S. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(86)80045-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0732-8893(86)80045-1
PMID:3516548
Abstract

Clostridium difficile has been shown to be the major cause of antibiotic-associated gastroenteritis in both humans and experimental animals. During the past few years an increasing number of laboratories have attempted to detect, isolate, and identify this organism and its toxin from clinical samples. Direct visualization of C. difficile in patient specimens using immunofluorescent microscopy has been proposed. The major disadvantage of this method was its lack of specificity due to crossreaction with other clostridial species. Attempts to absorb the antisera with crossreacting strains also failed. Laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile in clinical specimens has relied on either culture using one or more selective media or on the detection of specific cytotoxin in stool filtrates. Until recently the cytotoxicity assay was the only procedure available for the routine detection of cytotoxin and, as a result, has limited this test to laboratories with access to tissue culture facilities. As a result, there has been much interest in the development of immunochemical methods for the detection of C. difficile toxins. We originally reported on the detection of C. difficile toxin in stool filtrates using counterimmunoelectrophoresis. We examined 140 fecal specimens submitted for C. difficile toxin assay by counterimmunoelectrophoresis, using both unabsorbed and absorbed antitoxin, tissue culture, and bacterial culture. Using tissue culture assay as the reference method, the sensitivity of counterimmunoelectrophoresis and counterimmunoelectrophoresis-absorbed was 100% and the specificity 63.0% and 77.5%, respectively. Enzyme immunosorbent assays for the detection of toxin A from C. difficile have also been reported, however, at the present time they do not appear to be as sensitive as the cytotoxicity assay for toxin B (cytotoxin).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

艰难梭菌已被证明是人类和实验动物抗生素相关性肠胃炎的主要病因。在过去几年中,越来越多的实验室试图从临床样本中检测、分离和鉴定这种微生物及其毒素。有人提出使用免疫荧光显微镜直接观察患者标本中的艰难梭菌。该方法的主要缺点是由于与其他梭菌属物种发生交叉反应而缺乏特异性。用交叉反应菌株吸收抗血清的尝试也失败了。临床标本中艰难梭菌的实验室诊断依赖于使用一种或多种选择性培养基进行培养,或检测粪便滤液中的特定细胞毒素。直到最近,细胞毒性测定仍是常规检测细胞毒素的唯一方法,因此,该检测仅限于能够使用组织培养设施的实验室。因此,人们对开发用于检测艰难梭菌毒素的免疫化学方法非常感兴趣。我们最初报道了使用对流免疫电泳检测粪便滤液中的艰难梭菌毒素。我们使用未吸收和吸收的抗毒素、组织培养和细菌培养,通过对流免疫电泳检查了140份提交进行艰难梭菌毒素检测的粪便标本。以组织培养测定作为参考方法,对流免疫电泳和吸收后的对流免疫电泳的灵敏度分别为100%,特异性分别为63.0%和77.5%。也有报道称酶联免疫吸附测定法可检测艰难梭菌的毒素A,但目前它们似乎不如毒素B(细胞毒素)的细胞毒性测定法灵敏。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Considerations in the laboratory diagnosis of antibiotic-associated gastroenteritis.抗生素相关性肠胃炎实验室诊断的注意事项
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;4(3 Suppl):79S-86S. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(86)80045-1.
2
Evaluation of six commercial assays for the rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxin and/or antigen in stool specimens.六种用于快速检测粪便标本中艰难梭菌毒素和/或抗原的商业检测方法的评估。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001 Feb;7(2):55-64. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00141.x.
3
[Investigation of the presence of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic associated diarrhea patients by culture and toxin detection methods].[采用培养和毒素检测方法调查抗生素相关性腹泻患者中艰难梭菌的存在情况]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007 Jan;41(1):29-37.
4
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: usefulness of Premier Cytoclone A+B enzyme immunoassay for combined detection of stool toxins and toxigenic C. difficile strains.艰难梭菌相关性腹泻和结肠炎的实验室诊断:Premier Cytoclone A+B酶免疫测定法联合检测粪便毒素和产毒艰难梭菌菌株的实用性
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1996-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1996-1998.2001.
5
Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens.三种快速检测粪便标本中艰难梭菌毒素A和毒素B方法的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;26(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0251-7.
6
Comparing ImmunoCard with two EIA assays for Clostridium difficile toxins.将免疫卡与两种检测艰难梭菌毒素的酶免疫分析方法进行比较。
Clin Lab Sci. 2009 Spring;22(2):81-5.
7
[Usefulness of immunological detection of both toxin A and toxin B in stool samples for rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea].[粪便样本中A毒素和B毒素的免疫学检测对艰难梭菌相关性腹泻快速诊断的实用性]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2007 Jan;81(1):33-8. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.81.33.
8
Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A and its use in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease.艰难梭菌毒素A快速酶免疫测定法的开发及其在艰难梭菌相关性疾病诊断中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2724-30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.12.2724-2730.1991.
9
Comparison of the ToxA test with cytotoxicity assay and culture for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea disease.
J Med Microbiol. 1994 Nov;41(5):316-8. doi: 10.1099/00222615-41-5-316.
10
Comparison of culture, cytotoxicity assays, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for toxin A and toxin B in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-related enteric disease.用于艰难梭菌相关性肠道疾病诊断的培养法、细胞毒性测定法以及毒素A和毒素B的酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 May;5(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90092-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins.艰难梭菌:其所致疾病与毒素
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):1-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.1.1.1.
2
The clinical significance of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis in the 1990s.20世纪90年代抗生素相关性假膜性结肠炎的临床意义。
Drug Saf. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):339-49. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199106050-00004.