Hillyar Christopher R, Rizki Hirah, Begum Ruzi, Gupta Amit, Nagabhushan Nagesh, Lee Peng H, Smith Simon
Internal Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.
Surgery, Chelmsford Breast Unit, Broomfield Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Broomfield, GBR.
Cureus. 2022 Jan 12;14(1):e21177. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21177. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Background This study investigated the utility of ultrasound (US), 99mTc-Sestamibi scintigraphy (Sestamibi), and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) for pre-operative localization of a single abnormal parathyroid gland prior to minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) to determine the optimum pre-operative scans to facilitate a MIP. Methods Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent curative parathyroidectomy at Broomfield Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust between 2009 and 2018 were included. Diagnostic performance parameters and the agreement between US, Sestamibi, and 4DCT were evaluated. Cohen's κ was used to assess the strength of agreement between imaging modalities. Results At localizing pathology to the correct side of the neck, Sestamibi had the highest sensitivity (87%), followed by US (76%) and 4DCT (64%). 4DCT had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 95%, similar to Sestamibi (96%), but higher than US (92%). Amongst patients who underwent both US and Sestamibi, the abnormal parathyroid gland was localized to the same area by both imaging modalities in 77% of patients (Cohen's κ: 0.383). Following an inconclusive US or Sestamibi scan, or discordance between the two modalities, 4DCT was correct at localization in 63% of patients. Conclusion Sestamibi has the highest sensitivity and PPV for accurately localizing parathyroid pathology. The addition of US to a positive Sestamibi scan adds little additional value. 4DCT is the preferred imaging modality following an inconclusive Sestamibi or US.
背景 本研究调查了超声(US)、99m锝-甲氧基异丁基异腈闪烁扫描术(Sestamibi)和四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)在微创甲状旁腺切除术(MIP)前对单个异常甲状旁腺进行术前定位的效用,以确定有助于进行MIP的最佳术前扫描方法。方法 纳入2009年至2018年间在埃塞克斯郡国民保健服务基金会信托基金中南部布鲁姆菲尔德医院接受根治性甲状旁腺切除术的原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者。评估诊断性能参数以及US、Sestamibi和4DCT之间的一致性。采用科恩kappa系数评估成像方式之间的一致性强度。结果 在将病变定位到颈部正确一侧方面,Sestamibi的灵敏度最高(87%),其次是US(76%)和4DCT(64%)。4DCT的阳性预测值(PPV)为95%,与Sestamibi(96%)相似,但高于US(92%)。在同时接受US和Sestamibi检查的患者中,两种成像方式将异常甲状旁腺定位到同一区域的患者占77%(科恩kappa系数:0.383)。在US或Sestamibi扫描结果不明确或两种方式不一致之后,4DCT在63%的患者中定位正确。结论 Sestamibi在准确识别甲状旁腺病变方面具有最高的灵敏度和PPV。在Sestamibi扫描阳性的基础上加做US几乎没有额外价值。在Sestamibi或US检查结果不明确之后,4DCT是首选的成像方式。