Vasandani Nikhil
Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons In Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 7;16(1):e51828. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51828. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Background Primary hyperparathyroidism is an endocrinopathy associated with dysregulated calcium homeostasis. The most common etiology is a parathyroid adenoma most definitely managed via a parathyroidectomy. The two main surgical approaches include a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and open four-gland exploration (4-GE). MIP is the preferred operative strategy since it is associated with less postoperative complications. Accurate preoperative imaging is essential in informing the optimal approach to surgery. MIP is only considered if adenoma is able to be localized precisely. The most commonly used imaging modality includes ultrasound and sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT, either as a single or combination strategy. Other options include MRI, PET, and 4D CT. There is no universally accepted preoperative imaging strategy. The literature is discordant and recommendations proposed by existing guidelines are incongruous. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate currently utilized preoperative parathyroid imaging modalities at our institution and correlate them with surgical and histological findings to determine the most efficient imaging strategy to detect adenomas for our patient cohort. This will ultimately guide the best surgical approach for patients receiving parathyroidectomies. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of all patients undergoing first-time surgery for biochemically proven primary hyperparathyroidism at our institution over the past five years. Multiple data points were collected including modality of preoperative disease localization, operation type, final histopathology, biochemical investigations, and cure rate. Patients were categorized into one of three groups based on the method of disease localization. Results A total of 244 patients had parathyroidectomies performed at our institution in the past five years from January 2018 to December 2022. Ninety-six percent (n=235) of all patients received dual imaging preoperatively with SPECT/CT and ultrasound performed on the same day and therefore included in this study. A total of 64.3% (n=151) underwent MIP. Eighty percent (n=188) of all histopathology revealed adenomas and 26.8% (n=63) of patients had adenoma localized on SPECT/CT only (sensitivity: 58.1%, specificity: 71%, and positive predictive value {PPV}: 85.7%). A total of 9.8% (n=23) had adenoma localized on ultrasound only (sensitivity: 15.6%, specificity: 73.3%, and PPV: 65.2%). A total of 45.1% (n=106) were dual localized on both SPECT/CT and ultrasound (sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity: 46.6%, and PPV: 84.9%). The cure rate was 91.5% in the dual-localized group, 86% in the dual-unlocalized group, and 96.5% when localized with SPECT/CT alone. Conclusion A dual-imaging modality with SPECT/CT and ultrasound should remain the first-line imaging strategy. This approach has higher sensitivity rates and poses no inherent patient or surgical-related risks. Patients with disease unlocalized on SPECT/CT alone had a positive predictive value, specificity, and likelihood ratio for adenoma detection comparable to dual-localized patients. Therefore, SPECT/CT alone is sufficient for directing MIP in the presence of a negative ultrasound.
背景 原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进是一种与钙稳态失调相关的内分泌疾病。最常见的病因是甲状旁腺腺瘤,最肯定的治疗方法是甲状旁腺切除术。两种主要的手术方法包括微创甲状旁腺切除术(MIP)和开放性四腺探查术(4-GE)。MIP是首选的手术策略,因为它与较少的术后并发症相关。准确的术前成像对于确定最佳手术方法至关重要。只有在能够精确定位腺瘤时才考虑MIP。最常用的成像方式包括超声和锝[99mTc]甲氧基异丁基异腈单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)/CT,可单独使用或联合使用。其他选择包括MRI、PET和4D CT。目前尚无普遍接受的术前成像策略。文献存在分歧,现有指南提出的建议也不一致。目的 本研究旨在评估我院目前使用的术前甲状旁腺成像方式,并将其与手术和组织学结果相关联,以确定对我们的患者群体检测腺瘤最有效的成像策略。这最终将指导接受甲状旁腺切除术患者的最佳手术方法。方法 这是一项对我院过去五年中所有因生化证实的原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进而接受首次手术的患者进行的回顾性观察研究。收集了多个数据点,包括术前疾病定位方式、手术类型、最终组织病理学、生化检查和治愈率。根据疾病定位方法将患者分为三组之一。结果 在2018年1月至2022年12月的过去五年中,我院共有244例患者接受了甲状旁腺切除术。所有患者中有96%(n=235)术前接受了SPECT/CT和超声同日的双重成像,因此纳入本研究。共有64.3%(n=151)的患者接受了MIP。所有组织病理学检查中有80%(n=188)显示为腺瘤,26.8%(n=63)的患者仅在SPECT/CT上定位到腺瘤(敏感性:58.1%,特异性:71%,阳性预测值{PPV}:85.7%)。共有9.8%(n=23)的患者仅在超声上定位到腺瘤(敏感性:15.6%,特异性:73.3%,PPV:65.2%)。共有45.1%(n=106)的患者在SPECT/CT和超声上均定位到腺瘤(敏感性:75.6%,特异性:46.6%,PPV:84.9%)。双重定位组的治愈率为91.5%,双重未定位组为86%,仅用SPECT/CT定位时为96.5%。结论 SPECT/CT和超声的双重成像方式应仍然是一线成像策略。这种方法具有更高的敏感性,并且不会带来固有的患者或手术相关风险。仅在SPECT/CT上未定位到疾病的患者对于腺瘤检测的阳性预测值、特异性和似然比与双重定位患者相当。因此,在超声检查为阴性的情况下,仅SPECT/CT就足以指导MIP。