Suppr超能文献

通过比浊法、形态学和活菌计数测定阿莫西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢噻肟对肠杆菌科细菌的抗菌效果比较

Comparative antibacterial effects of amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanic acid and cefotaxime against Enterobacteriaceae as determined by turbidimetry, morphology and viable count.

作者信息

Wilson J M, Hunter P A

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1986;32(2):118-25. doi: 10.1159/000238400.

Abstract

Cefotaxime has extremely low MIC values in comparison with amoxycillin against Enterobacteriaceae, but studies of antibacterial activity using turbidimetric and viable count methods show no advantage for cefotaxime. Superior rates of killing have been demonstrated for amoxycillin and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid using both constant antibiotic concentrations and changing concentrations to simulate conditions in vivo. Slow bactericidal activity was seen with cefotaxime even at levels greatly in excess of the MIC and could be correlated with filament formation by this compound over a wide range of concentrations.

摘要

与阿莫西林相比,头孢噻肟对肠杆菌科细菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)极低,但采用比浊法和活菌计数法进行的抗菌活性研究表明,头孢噻肟并无优势。使用恒定抗生素浓度和改变浓度以模拟体内条件的方法,均已证明阿莫西林和阿莫西林/克拉维酸具有更高的杀菌率。即便头孢噻肟的浓度大大超过最低抑菌浓度,其杀菌活性依然缓慢,且在很宽的浓度范围内,这可能与该化合物形成丝状有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验