Suppr超能文献

通过比浊法、形态学和活菌计数测定阿莫西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸和头孢噻肟对肠杆菌科细菌的抗菌效果比较

Comparative antibacterial effects of amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanic acid and cefotaxime against Enterobacteriaceae as determined by turbidimetry, morphology and viable count.

作者信息

Wilson J M, Hunter P A

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1986;32(2):118-25. doi: 10.1159/000238400.

Abstract

Cefotaxime has extremely low MIC values in comparison with amoxycillin against Enterobacteriaceae, but studies of antibacterial activity using turbidimetric and viable count methods show no advantage for cefotaxime. Superior rates of killing have been demonstrated for amoxycillin and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid using both constant antibiotic concentrations and changing concentrations to simulate conditions in vivo. Slow bactericidal activity was seen with cefotaxime even at levels greatly in excess of the MIC and could be correlated with filament formation by this compound over a wide range of concentrations.

摘要

与阿莫西林相比,头孢噻肟对肠杆菌科细菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)极低,但采用比浊法和活菌计数法进行的抗菌活性研究表明,头孢噻肟并无优势。使用恒定抗生素浓度和改变浓度以模拟体内条件的方法,均已证明阿莫西林和阿莫西林/克拉维酸具有更高的杀菌率。即便头孢噻肟的浓度大大超过最低抑菌浓度,其杀菌活性依然缓慢,且在很宽的浓度范围内,这可能与该化合物形成丝状有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验