Patterson Gentile Carlyn, Aguirre Geoffrey K, Arbogast Kristy B, Master Christina L
Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Mar 3;39(11-12):841-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0475.
Increased sensitivity to light is common after concussion. Viewing a flickering light can also produce uncomfortable somatic sensations like nausea or headache. We examined effects evoked by viewing a patterned, flickering screen in a cohort of 81 uninjured youth athletes and 84 concussed youth. We used Multiple correspondence analysis and identified two primary dimensions of variation: the presence or absence of visually evoked effects and variation in the tendency to manifest effects that localized to the eyes (e.g., eye watering) versus more generalized neurological effects (e.g., headache). Based on these two primary dimensions, we grouped participants into three categories of evoked symptomatology: no effects, eye-predominant effects, and brain-predominant effects. A similar proportion of participants reported eye-predominant effects in the uninjured (33.3%) and concussed (32.1%) groups. By contrast, participants who experienced brain-predominant effects were almost entirely from the concussed group (1.2% of uninjured, 35.7% of concussed). The presence of brain-predominant effects was associated with a higher concussion symptom burden and reduced performance on visio-vestibular tasks. Our findings indicate that the experience of negative constitutional, somatic sensations in response to a dynamic visual stimulus is a salient marker of concussion and is indicative of more severe concussion symptomatology. We speculate that differences in visually evoked effects reflect varying levels of activation of the trigeminal nociceptive system.
脑震荡后对光线的敏感度增加很常见。观看闪烁的灯光也会产生诸如恶心或头痛等不舒服的躯体感觉。我们在81名未受伤的青年运动员和84名脑震荡青年组成的队列中,研究了观看有图案的闪烁屏幕所诱发的影响。我们使用多重对应分析并确定了两个主要的变异维度:是否存在视觉诱发效应,以及表现为局限于眼睛的效应(如流泪)与更广泛的神经效应(如头痛)的倾向差异。基于这两个主要维度,我们将参与者分为三类诱发症状:无效应、以眼睛为主的效应和以大脑为主的效应。在未受伤组(33.3%)和脑震荡组(32.1%)中,报告以眼睛为主的效应的参与者比例相似。相比之下,经历以大脑为主的效应的参与者几乎全部来自脑震荡组(未受伤组的1.2%,脑震荡组的35.7%)。以大脑为主的效应的存在与更高的脑震荡症状负担以及视前庭任务表现下降有关。我们的研究结果表明,对动态视觉刺激产生负面的体质性躯体感觉是脑震荡的一个显著标志,并且表明脑震荡症状更严重。我们推测视觉诱发效应的差异反映了三叉神经伤害感受系统的不同激活水平。