Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Anaesthesia. 2022 Apr;77(4):416-427. doi: 10.1111/anae.15671. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
Mortality and morbidity for high-risk surgical patients are often high, especially in low-resource settings. Enhanced peri-operative care has the potential to reduce preventable deaths but must be designed to meet local needs. This before-and-after cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a postoperative 48-hour enhanced care pathway for high-risk surgical patients ('high-risk surgical bundle') who did not meet the criteria for elective admission to intensive care. The pathway comprised of six elements: risk identification and communication; adoption of a high-risk post-anaesthesia care unit discharge checklist; prompt nursing admission to ward; intensification of vital signs monitoring; troponin measurement; and prompt access to medical support if required. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Data describing 1189 patients from two groups, before and after implementation of the pathway, were compared. The usual care group comprised a retrospective cohort of high-risk surgical patients between September 2015 and December 2016. The intervention group prospectively included high-risk surgical patients from February 2019 to March 2020. Unadjusted mortality rate was 10.5% (78/746) for the usual care and 6.3% (28/443) for the intervention group. After adjustment, the intervention effect remained significant (RR 0.46 (95%CI 0.30-0.72). The high-risk surgical bundle group received more rapid response team calls (24% vs. 12.6%; RR 0.63 [95%CI 0.49-0.80]) and surgical re-interventions (18.9 vs. 7.5%; RR 0.41 [95%CI 0.30-0.59]). These data suggest that a clinical pathway based on enhanced surveillance for high-risk surgical patients in a resource-constrained setting could reduce in-hospital mortality.
高危手术患者的死亡率和发病率通常较高,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中。强化围手术期护理有可能降低可预防的死亡人数,但必须根据当地需求进行设计。本项前后对照队列研究旨在评估针对不符合重症监护 elective入住标准的高危手术患者(“高危手术包”)的术后 48 小时强化护理途径的有效性。该途径包含 6 个要素:风险识别和沟通;采用高危麻醉后护理单元出院清单;及时将患者转移到病房护理;加强生命体征监测;肌钙蛋白测量;以及在需要时及时获得医疗支持。主要结局为院内死亡率。比较了实施该途径前后两组(共 1189 例患者)的数据。常规护理组包括 2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 12 月期间的高危手术患者回顾性队列。干预组前瞻性纳入 2019 年 2 月至 2020 年 3 月期间的高危手术患者。常规护理组未调整的死亡率为 10.5%(78/746),干预组为 6.3%(28/443)。调整后,干预效果仍然显著(RR 0.46(95%CI 0.30-0.72))。高危手术包组接受了更多的快速反应团队呼叫(24% vs. 12.6%;RR 0.63(95%CI 0.49-0.80))和外科再干预(18.9% vs. 7.5%;RR 0.41(95%CI 0.30-0.59))。这些数据表明,在资源有限的环境中,基于对高危手术患者强化监测的临床途径可能会降低院内死亡率。